Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29352758›Full record

ReviewDer Orthopade2018

[Arthroscopic rotator cuff surgery : New and established methods].

S Pauly, M Scheibel

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Orthopade, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

S PaulyCentrum für Muskuloskeletale Chirurgie (CMSC), Campus-Mitte und Campus-Virchow, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Deutschland. stephan.pauly@charite.de.
M ScheibelCentrum für Muskuloskeletale Chirurgie (CMSC), Campus-Mitte und Campus-Virchow, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This present article summarizes established and current developments and aspects of rotator cuff surgery. Achieved milestones as well as current approaches are presented and assessed with respect to their clinical and radiographic impact. Despite biomechanical and technical improvements in modern rotator cuff repair techniques, re-defect and re-tearing rates could not be fully eliminated. Meanwhile, the importance of biological processes around successful tendon-bone reintegration has been increasingly recognized. Hence, this article presents the current scientific standing regarding biological growth factors, platelet-rich plasma and rotator cuff augmentation techniques (with allogenic/autologous grafts). In summary, there are clear biomechanical advantages as well as many promising approaches to biological augmentation; however, the latter have not yet been transferred into regular clinical application.

Indexed as

ArthroscopyBiomechanical PhenomenaHumansIntercellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsPlatelet-Rich PlasmaRecurrenceReoperationRotator CuffRotator Cuff InjuriesIntercellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsBiological augmentationBiomechanicsDouble rowGrowth factorsPlatelet-rich plasma

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.