Trial reportInternational journal of medical education2018
Use of e-learning in clinical clerkships: effects on acquisition of dermatological knowledge and learning processes.
Trial report in International journal of medical education, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Use of the Smartphone App WhatsApp as an E-Learning Method for Medical Residents: Multicenter Controlled Randomized Trial.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2019Trial
- Dermatology teaching for undergraduate medical students in clinical routine - a structured four-week curriculum.BMC medical education · 2024Article
- Comparison of Blended Learning With Traditional Dermatology Learning for Medical Students: Prospective Evaluation Study.JMIR formative research · 2024Article
- Development and Implementation of a Pediatric Pulmonary-Focused Active Learning Curriculum.MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources · 2024Article
- Evaluating Live Virtual Chalk Talks as a Teaching Tool for Medical Students on a Dermatology Clerkship.Medical science educator · 2023Article
- Exploring the activities and outcomes of digital teaching and learning of practical skills in higher education for the social and health care professions: a scoping review.Discover education · 2023Article
- Experiences with alternative online lectures in medical education in obstetrics and gynecology during the COVID-19 pandemic-possible efficient and student-orientated models for the future?Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2022Article
- Article
- A dermatology E-learning programme is perceived as a valuable learning tool in postgraduate general practice training.International journal of medical education · 2021Article
- Medical students' acceptance and perceptions of e-learning during the Covid-19 closure time in King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah.Journal of infection and public health · 2021Article
- The Impact of SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) Pandemic on International Dermatology Conferences in 2020.Frontiers in medicine · 2021Article
- Development of a Novel Interactive Multimedia E-Learning Model to Enhance Clinical Competency Training and Quality of Care among Medical Students.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- Self-learning of point-of-care cardiac ultrasound - Can medical students teach themselves?PloS one · 2018Article
- Article
- Design and Implementation of a Brief, Self-Directed Course on Immunotherapy Best Practices for Neurology Trainees.Journal of medical education and curricular developmentArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo obtain a deeper understanding of how the e-learning program, Education in Dermatology (ED), affects the acquisition of dermatological knowledge and the underlying learning processes of medical students in their clinical phase.
methodsThe study used a mixed method design with a convergent parallel collection of data. Medical students (n=62) from Maastricht University (The Netherlands) were randomized to either a conventional teaching group (control group n=30) or conventional teaching plus the e-learning program (application on smartphone) group (e-learning group n=32). Pre- and post-intervention knowledge test results were analysed using an independent t-test. Individual semi-structured interviews (n=9) were conducted and verbatim-transcribed recordings were analysed using King's template analysis.
resultsThe e-learning program positively influenced students' level of knowledge and their process of learning. A significant difference was found in the post-test scores for the control group (M=51.4, SD=6.43) and the e-learning group (M=73.09, SD=5.12); t(60)=-14.75, p<0.000). Interview data showed that the e-learning program stimulated students' learning as the application promoted the identification and recognition of skin disorders, the use of references, creation of documents and sharing information with colleagues.
conclusionsThis study demonstrated that use of the e-learning program led to a significant improvement in basic dermatological knowledge. The underlying learning processes indicated that e-learning programs in dermatology filled a vital gap in the understanding of clinical reasoning in dermatology. These results might be useful when developing (clinical) teaching formats with a special focus on visual disciplines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.