Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29352748›Full record

Trial reportInternational journal of medical education2018

Use of e-learning in clinical clerkships: effects on acquisition of dermatological knowledge and learning processes.

Frederike Fransen, Herm Martens, Ivo Nagtzaam, Sylvia Heeneman

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in International journal of medical education, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Development and Implementation of a Pediatric Pulmonary-Focused Active Learning Curriculum.MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Frederike FransenDepartment of Dermatology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Herm MartensDepartment of Dermatology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Ivo NagtzaamDepartment of Dermatology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Sylvia HeenemanDepartment of Pathology, School of Health Profession Education, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo obtain a deeper understanding of how the e-learning program, Education in Dermatology (ED), affects the acquisition of dermatological knowledge and the underlying learning processes of medical students in their clinical phase.

methodsThe study used a mixed method design with a convergent parallel collection of data. Medical students (n=62) from Maastricht University (The Netherlands) were randomized to either a conventional teaching group (control group n=30) or conventional teaching plus the e-learning program (application on smartphone) group (e-learning group n=32). Pre- and post-intervention knowledge test results were analysed using an independent t-test. Individual semi-structured interviews (n=9) were conducted and verbatim-transcribed recordings were analysed using King's template analysis.

resultsThe e-learning program positively influenced students' level of knowledge and their process of learning. A significant difference was found in the post-test scores for the control group (M=51.4, SD=6.43) and the e-learning group (M=73.09, SD=5.12); t(60)=-14.75, p<0.000). Interview data showed that the e-learning program stimulated students' learning as the application promoted the identification and recognition of skin disorders, the use of references, creation of documents and sharing information with colleagues.

conclusionsThis study demonstrated that use of the e-learning program led to a significant improvement in basic dermatological knowledge. The underlying learning processes indicated that e-learning programs in dermatology filled a vital gap in the understanding of clinical reasoning in dermatology. These results might be useful when developing (clinical) teaching formats with a special focus on visual disciplines.

Indexed as

LearningStudents, MedicalAdultClinical ClerkshipClinical CompetenceComputer-Assisted InstructionDermatologyEducational MeasurementEducation, Medical, UndergraduateHumansKnowledgeNetherlandsProgram EvaluationYoung Adultclinical phasedermatologye-learninglearning theorymixed methodsstudents’ perceptions

Identifiers

PMID29352748
PMCPMC5834826

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.