Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29352548›Full record

ArticleWorld psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA)2018

Prediction of psychosis across protocols and risk cohorts using automated language analysis.

Cheryl M Corcoran, Facundo Carrillo, Diego Fernández-Slezak, Gillinder Bedi, Casimir Klim, Daniel C Javitt, Carrie E Bearden, Guillermo A Cecchi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 182 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
182citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

182 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. DISCOURSE in Psychosis: introducing an international consortium for research on thought, language and communication.World psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA) · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

122 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Cheryl M CorcoranDepartment of Psychiatry, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Facundo CarrilloDepartamento de Computación, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Diego Fernández-SlezakDepartamento de Computación, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Gillinder BediNew York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, NY, USA.
Casimir KlimNew York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, NY, USA.
Daniel C JavittNew York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, NY, USA.
Carrie E BeardenDepartment of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences and Psychology, University of California Los Angeles; Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Guillermo A CecchiComputational Biology Center - Neuroscience, IBM T.J. Watson Research Center, Ossining, NY, USA.

Funding

Thought disorder and social cognition in clinical risk states for schizophreniaR01MH107558 · NIMH · NEW YORK STATE PSYCHIATRIC INSTITUTE DBA RESEARCH FOUNDATION FOR MENTAL HYGIENE, INC · PI CORCORAN, CHERYL MARY · 2016 to 2020
$3.3M
Using the RDoC Approach to Understand Thought Disorder: A Linguistic Corpus-Based ApproachR01MH115332 · NIMH · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI CORCORAN, CHERYL MARY · 2018 to 2020
$1.6M
Automated linguistic analyses of semantics and syntax in speech output in the psychosis prodrome: A novel paradigm to evaluate subtle thought disorder.R03MH108933 · NIMH · NEW YORK STATE PSYCHIATRIC INSTITUTE DBA RESEARCH FOUNDATION FOR MENTAL HYGIENE, INC · PI CORCORAN, CHERYL MARY · 2016 to 2017
$164k
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH107558NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH115332NIMH NIH HHS R03 MH108933
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Language and speech are the primary source of data for psychiatrists to diagnose and treat mental disorders. In psychosis, the very structure of language can be disturbed, including semantic coherence (e.g., derailment and tangentiality) and syntactic complexity (e.g., concreteness). Subtle disturbances in language are evident in schizophrenia even prior to first psychosis onset, during prodromal stages. Using computer-based natural language processing analyses, we previously showed that, among English-speaking clinical (e.g., ultra) high-risk youths, baseline reduction in semantic coherence (the flow of meaning in speech) and in syntactic complexity could predict subsequent psychosis onset with high accuracy. Herein, we aimed to cross-validate these automated linguistic analytic methods in a second larger risk cohort, also English-speaking, and to discriminate speech in psychosis from normal speech. We identified an automated machine-learning speech classifier - comprising decreased semantic coherence, greater variance in that coherence, and reduced usage of possessive pronouns - that had an 83% accuracy in predicting psychosis onset (intra-protocol), a cross-validated accuracy of 79% of psychosis onset prediction in the original risk cohort (cross-protocol), and a 72% accuracy in discriminating the speech of recent-onset psychosis patients from that of healthy individuals. The classifier was highly correlated with previously identified manual linguistic predictors. Our findings support the utility and validity of automated natural language processing methods to characterize disturbances in semantics and syntax across stages of psychotic disorder. The next steps will be to apply these methods in larger risk cohorts to further test reproducibility, also in languages other than English, and identify sources of variability. This technology has the potential to improve prediction of psychosis outcome among at-risk youths and identify linguistic targets for remediation and preventive intervention. More broadly, automated linguistic analysis can be a powerful tool for diagnosis and treatment across neuropsychiatry.

Indexed as

Automated language analysishigh-risk youthsmachine learningprediction of psychosissemantic coherencesyntactic complexity

Identifiers

PMID29352548
PMCPMC5775133

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.