ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract2018
Laparoscopic and Endoscopic Cooperative Surgery Versus Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for the Treatment of Low-Risk Tumors of the Duodenum.
Article in Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy and Safety of Laparoscopic Endoscopic Cooperative Surgery in Upper Gastrointestinal Lesions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.GE Portuguese journal of gastroenterology · 2023Pooled it
- Clinical practice guidelines for duodenal cancer 2025.Journal of gastroenterology · 2026Review
- Feasibility and safety of surgical strategy based on tumor characteristics and location in laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery for non-ampullary duodenal tumors.Updates in surgery · 2026Article
- Comparison Between endoscopic submucosal dissection and laparoscopic endoscopic cooperative surgery for non-ampullary duodenal neuroendocrine tumors: a single-center retrospective cohort study.International journal of surgery (London, England) · 2026Article
- Short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic endoscopic cooperative surgery for duodenal neoplasms: a retrospective single-center study.Surgical endoscopy · 2025Article
- Short- and long-term outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection and laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery for superficial non-ampullary duodenal epithelial tumors.Surgical endoscopy · 2024Article
- Endoscopic diagnosis and treatment of superficial non-ampullary duodenal epithelial tumors: A review.Journal of translational internal medicine · 2023Article
- Issues and Prospects of Current Endoscopic Treatment Strategy for Superficial Non-Ampullary Duodenal Epithelial Tumors.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2022Review
- Clip-guided local duodenectomy for safe and minimal local resection of nonampullary duodenal neoplasms.BMC surgery · 2022Observational
- Clinicopathological features and management strategy for superficial nonampullary duodenal tumors: a multi-center retrospective study.Annals of surgical treatment and research · 2022Article
- Risk factors for lymph node metastasis and indication of local resection in duodenal neuroendocrine tumors.JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2022Article
- Endoscopic submucosal tunnel dissection versus conventional endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancers: outcomes of 799 consecutive cases in a single institution.Surgical endoscopy · 2020Article
- Laparoscopic Limited Resection for Duodenal Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2020Article
- Traumatic neuroma of remnant cystic duct mimicking duodenal subepithelial tumor: A case report.World journal of clinical cases · 2020Article
- Pathologic Evaluation of Endoscopically Resected Non-Ampullary Duodenal Lesions: A Single Center Experience.Turk patoloji dergisi · 2020Article
- Laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery for gastric tumors: Perspective for actual practice and oncological benefits.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2018Review
- The Efficacy of Autologous Myoblast Sheet Transplantation to Prevent Perforation After Duodenal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection in Porcine Model.Cell transplantationArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThere have been no comparative studies of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) and laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery (LECS) for patients with duodenal tumors regarding surgical outcomes. The aim of this study is to compare the safety and feasibility of short-term surgical outcomes of ESD and LECS for patients with low-risk tumors of the duodenum.
methodsThis was a single-center retrospective study of 68 consecutive patients with low-risk tumors of the duodenum who received surgical treatments. ESD (n = 50) was performed between 2000 and 2013 and LECS (n = 18) was performed between 2014 and 2017.
resultsThe overall incidence of perioperative complications was significantly higher in the ESD group (28%) than in the LECS group (0%) (P = 0.014). In the ESD group, eight patients with intraoperative perforation of duodenum (16%) were repaired with metal clips. Postoperative duodenal hemorrhage occurred in three patients (6%). Postoperative duodenal stricture requiring endoscopically guided balloon dilation was observed in two patients (4%). Postoperative bile leakage was found in one patient (2%). The size of resected lesion was significantly larger in the LECS group (26.5 mm) than in the ESD group (14.5 mm) (P = 0.003). In LECS group, all 18 patients underwent curative resection; however, the curative resection rate was 52% in ESD group (P = 0.001).
conclusionLECS for patients with low-risk tumors of the duodenum is a safe, feasible, and ideal alternative to ESD with regard to short-term surgical outcomes.
trial registrationUMIN000021200 ( http://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/ ).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.