Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29352393›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2018

Eco-friendly pheromone dispensers-a green route to manage the European grapevine moth?

Andrea Lucchi, Edith Ladurner, Andrea Iodice, Francesco Savino, Renato Ricciardi, Francesca Cosci, Giuseppe Conte, Giovanni Benelli

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Suspension of pheromone microcapsules on vine leaves acting as passive dispensers against pests.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2022
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Managing the vine mealybug, Planococcus ficus, through pheromone-mediated mating disruption.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2019
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Disrupting mating of Lobesia botrana using sex pheromone aerosol devices.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2018
    Article
  16. Towards pesticide-free farming? Sharing needs and knowledge promotes Integrated Pest Management.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Andrea LucchiDepartment of Agriculture, Food and Environment, University of Pisa, via del Borghetto 80, 56124, Pisa, Italy.
Edith LadurnerCBC (Europe) Srl, Biogard Division, via E. Majorana 2, 20834, Nova Milanese, MB, Italy.
Andrea IodiceCBC (Europe) Srl, Biogard Division, via E. Majorana 2, 20834, Nova Milanese, MB, Italy.
Francesco SavinoCBC (Europe) Srl, Biogard Division, via E. Majorana 2, 20834, Nova Milanese, MB, Italy.
Renato RicciardiDepartment of Agriculture, Food and Environment, University of Pisa, via del Borghetto 80, 56124, Pisa, Italy.
Francesca CosciDepartment of Agriculture, Food and Environment, University of Pisa, via del Borghetto 80, 56124, Pisa, Italy.
Giuseppe ConteDepartment of Agriculture, Food and Environment, University of Pisa, via del Borghetto 80, 56124, Pisa, Italy.
Giovanni BenelliDepartment of Agriculture, Food and Environment, University of Pisa, via del Borghetto 80, 56124, Pisa, Italy. giovanni.benelli@santannapisa.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8971-6010

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The development of environmentally sustainable control strategies to fight insect pests is a key challenge nowadays. Pheromone-mediated mating disruption (MD) is based on the release of synthetic sex attractants into a crop, interfering with mate finding of a given pest species. However, a limited number of research items have been published on the optimization of MD strategies against the European grapevine moth, Lobesia botrana, as well as on the use of biodegradable dispensers to reduce waste production in vineyards, despite the high economic importance of this pest. Therefore, the present study evaluated the efficacy of the MD products Isonet® L TT and the biodegradable Isonet® L TT BIO, applied at various densities, in reducing L. botrana damage on grapevine in comparison to an untreated control and the reference MD product Isonet® L. Experiments were conducted in three different areas of grapevine cultivation, located in Central and Northern Italy, over three different years. Our MD approach allowed a reliable control of the three generations of L. botrana during the whole grape growing season, leading to a significant reduction in the infested flower clusters and bunches, as well as in the number of nests per flower cluster and bunch, if compared to the untreated control. The performances of Isonet® L TT BIO, Isonet® LTT, and Isonet® L did not differ in terms of infested flower clusters/bunches, as well as nests per flower cluster/bunch. This was confirmed in all experimental sites over 3 years of field experiments. Overall, the present research provides useful information for the optimization of MD programs against L. botrana, highlighting the interesting potential of biodegradable pheromone dispensers that can be easily applied at low densities in vineyards, reducing the use of chemical pesticides to control moth pests.

Indexed as

Pest Control, BiologicalAnimalsColorInsectaItalyMothsPheromonesReproductionSeasonsSex AttractantsVitisPheromonesSex AttractantsChemical ecologyIntegrated pest managementLobesia botranaMating disruptionPesticide-free farmingSex pheromones

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.