Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29352380›Full record

Trial reportEuropean radiology2018

Integrated prediction of lesion-specific ischaemia from quantitative coronary CT angiography using machine learning: a multicentre study.

Damini Dey, Sara Gaur, Kristian A Ovrehus, Piotr J Slomka, Julian Betancur, Markus Goeller, Michaela M Hell, Heidi Gransar, Daniel S Berman, Stephan Achenbach and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in European radiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 99 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
99citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
14.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

99 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 166 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Predicting Chronic Myocardial Ischemia Using CCTA-Based Radiomics Machine Learning Nomogram.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2022
    Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. A leap into the future: excluding the ischaemic origin of chest pain through artificial intelligence.European heart journal supplements : journal of the European Society of Cardiology · 2026
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

39 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Damini DeyBiomedical Imaging Research Institute, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Taper building, A238, 8700 Beverly Blvd, Los Angeles, 90048, USA. Damini.Dey@cshs.org.
Sara GaurDepartment of Cardiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Kristian A OvrehusDepartment of Cardiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Piotr J SlomkaDepartments of Imaging and Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Julian BetancurDepartments of Imaging and Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Markus GoellerBiomedical Imaging Research Institute, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Taper building, A238, 8700 Beverly Blvd, Los Angeles, 90048, USA.
Michaela M HellDepartment of Cardiology, Friedrich-Alexander Universitat Erlangen-Nurnberg, Erlangen, Germany.
Heidi GransarDepartments of Imaging and Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Daniel S BermanDepartments of Imaging and Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Stephan AchenbachDepartment of Cardiology, Friedrich-Alexander Universitat Erlangen-Nurnberg, Erlangen, Germany.
Hans Erik BotkerDepartment of Cardiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Jesper Moller JensenDepartment of Cardiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Jens Flensted LassenDepartment of Cardiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Bjarne Linde NorgaardDepartment of Cardiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Aarhus University Hospital · DKCedars-Sinai Medical Center · USFriedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg · DE

Funding

Automated quantitative CT imaging of epicardial adipose tissue and risk of cardiac eventsR01HL133616 · NHLBI · CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER · PI DEY, DAMINI · 2016 to 2019
$2.6M
Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung 01EX1012BNational Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute R01HL133616NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL133616
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesWe aimed to investigate if lesion-specific ischaemia by invasive fractional flow reserve (FFR) can be predicted by an integrated machine learning (ML) ischaemia risk score from quantitative plaque measures from coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA).

methodsIn a multicentre trial of 254 patients, CTA and invasive coronary angiography were performed, with FFR in 484 vessels. CTA data sets were analysed by semi-automated software to quantify stenosis and non-calcified (NCP), low-density NCP (LD-NCP, < 30 HU), calcified and total plaque volumes, contrast density difference (CDD, maximum difference in luminal attenuation per unit area) and plaque length. ML integration included automated feature selection and model building from quantitative CTA with a boosted ensemble algorithm, and tenfold stratified cross-validation.

resultsEighty patients had ischaemia by FFR (FFR ≤ 0.80) in 100 vessels. Information gain for predicting ischaemia was highest for CDD (0.172), followed by LD-NCP (0.125), NCP (0.097), and total plaque volumes (0.092). ML exhibited higher area-under-the-curve (0.84) than individual CTA measures, including stenosis (0.76), LD-NCP volume (0.77), total plaque volume (0.74) and pre-test likelihood of coronary artery disease (CAD) (0.63); p < 0.006.

conclusionsIntegrated ML ischaemia risk score improved the prediction of lesion-specific ischaemia by invasive FFR, over stenosis, plaque measures and pre-test likelihood of CAD. KEY POINTS: • Integrated ischaemia risk score improved prediction of ischaemia over quantitative plaque measures • Integrated ischaemia risk score showed higher prediction of ischaemia than standard approach • Contrast density difference had the highest information gain to identify lesion-specific ischaemia.

Indexed as

Machine LearningAdultAgedAged, 80 and overComputed Tomography AngiographyCoronary AngiographyCoronary Artery DiseaseCoronary StenosisFemaleFractional Flow Reserve, MyocardialHemodynamicsHumansMaleMiddle AgedMyocardial IschemiaPlaque, AtheroscleroticAtherosclerotic plaqueComputed tomography angiographyCoronary stenosisIschaemiaMachine learning

Identifiers

PMID29352380
PMCPMC5940537
OpenAlexW2792589984

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.