Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29352368›Full record

ReviewBreast cancer research and treatment2018

Endocrine therapy and related issues in hormone receptor-positive early breast cancer: a roundtable discussion by the breast cancer therapy expert group (BCTEG).

Jame Abraham, Humberto Caldera, Robert Coleman, Anthony Elias, Matthew P Goetz, Muaiad Kittaneh, Elyse Lower, Reshma Mahtani, E Terry Mamounas, Mark Pegram and 4 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Breast cancer research and treatment, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Recent advances in non-pharmacological interventions for symptom burden management in breast cancer patients treated with ovarian function suppression.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 13 institutions in 2 countries.

Jame AbrahamCleveland Clinic, Cleveland, USA.
Humberto CalderaHematology Oncology Associates, Lake Worth, FL, USA.
Robert ColemanUniversity of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Anthony EliasUniversity of Colorado, Denver, CO, USA.
Matthew P GoetzMayo Clinic, Rochester, USA.
Muaiad KittanehLoyola University, Maywood, USA. mkittaneh@me.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1187-593X
Elyse LowerUniversity of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, USA.
Reshma MahtaniUniversity of Miami, Deerfield Beach, FL, USA.
E Terry MamounasUniversity of Florida, Orlando, FL, USA.
Mark PegramStanford University, Stanford, USA.
Hope RugoUniversity of California, San Francisco, USA.
Lee SchwartzbergUniversity of Tennessee, Knoxville, USA.
Tiffany TrainaMemorial Sloan Kettering, New York City, USA.
Chuck VogelUniversity of Miami, Deerfield Beach, FL, USA.
University of Miami · USCleveland Clinic · USHematology Oncology Associates · USLoyola University Chicago · USMayo Clinic in Florida · USMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USStanford University · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · USUniversity of Cincinnati · USUniversity of Colorado Denver · USUniversity of Florida · USUniversity of Sheffield · GBUniversity of Tennessee at Knoxville · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeManagement of breast cancer is a rapidly evolving field, and, although evidence-based guidelines are available for clinicians to provide direction on critical issues in patient care, clinicians often left to address these issues in the context of community practice situations with their patients. These include the patient's comorbid conditions, actual versus perceived benefit of treatments, patient's compliance as well as financial/reimbursement issues, and long-term tolerability of therapy.

methodsA meeting of global oncology experts was convened in January 2017 with the belief that there is a gap in clinical practice guidance on several fundamental issues in breast cancer care, particularly in the community setting, where oncologists may encounter multiple tumor types. The goal was to discuss some of the most important questions in this area and provide some guidance for practicing oncologists.

resultsTopics addressed included risk of contralateral breast cancer recurrence in patients with estrogen receptor-positive early breast cancer who have undergone 5 years of adjuvant endocrine therapy, adverse events associated with endocrine therapy and their management, emergent data on adjuvant bisphosphonate therapy and its apparent benefit in reducing breast cancer recurrence, recent findings of extended adjuvant endocrine therapy trials, and the use of currently available genomic biomarker tests as a means of further informing treatment decisions.

conclusionsA summary of the discussion on these topics and several 'expert opinion statements' are provided herein in an effort to convey the collective insights of the panel as it relates to current standard practice.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Agents, HormonalBreast NeoplasmsChemotherapy, AdjuvantCombined Modality TherapyFemaleHumansNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalReceptors, EstrogenTamoxifenAntineoplastic Agents, HormonalReceptors, EstrogenTamoxifenBisphosphonate therapyBreast cancer therapyEndocrine therapyExpert groupExtended adjuvant therapyGenomic testing

Identifiers

PMID29352368
PMCPMC5882621
OpenAlexW2787932235

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.