Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29352347›Full record

ReviewEuropean journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society2018

Autologous cell-based therapy for treatment of large bone defects: from bench to bedside.

R Verboket, M Leiblein, C Seebach, C Nau, M Janko, M Bellen, H Bönig, D Henrich, I Marzi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Surgical suction filter-derived bone graft displays osteogenic miRNA and mRNA patterns.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2024
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Porous Biocoatings Based on Diatomite with Incorporated ZrOJournal of functional biomaterials · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

R VerboketDepartment of Trauma-, Hand- and Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1086-4016
M LeibleinDepartment of Trauma-, Hand- and Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.
C SeebachDepartment of Trauma-, Hand- and Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.
C NauDepartment of Trauma-, Hand- and Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.
M JankoDepartment of Trauma-, Hand- and Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.
M BellenDepartment of Trauma-, Hand- and Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.
H BönigDepartment of Transfusion Medicine and Immune Hematology, University Hospital Frankfurt and DRK Blood Donor Service Baden-Württemberg-Hessen, Frankfurt, Germany.
D HenrichDepartment of Trauma-, Hand- and Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.
I MarziDepartment of Trauma-, Hand- and Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany. marzi@trauma.uni-frankfurt.de.

Funding

AO 05-S23, S-10-47-H, S-11-64-NLOEWE Center for Cell and Gene Therapy Frankfurt III L 4-518/17.004 [2010]
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesReconstruction of long segmental bone defects is demanding for patients and surgeons, and associated with long-term treatment periods and substantial complication rates in addition to high costs. While defects up to 4-5 cm length might be filled up with autologous bone graft, heterologous bone from cadavers, or artificial bone graft substitutes, current options to reconstruct bone defects greater than 5 cm consist of either vascularized free bone transfers, the Masquelet technique or the Ilizarov distraction osteogenesis. Alternatively, autologous cell transplantation is an encouraging treatment option for large bone defects as it eliminates problems such as limited autologous bone availability, allogenic bone immunogenicity, and donor-site morbidity, and might be used for stabilizing loose alloplastic implants.

methodsThe authors show different cell therapies without expansion in culture, with ex vivo expansion and cell therapy in local bone defects, bone healing and osteonecrosis. Different kinds of cells and scaffolds investigated in our group as well as in vivo transfer studies and BMC used in clinical phase I and IIa clinical trials of our group are shown.

resultsOur research history demonstrated the great potential of various stem cell species to support bone defect healing. It was clearly shown that the combination of different cell types is superior to approaches using single cell types. We further demonstrate that it is feasible to translate preclinically developed protocols from in vitro to in vivo experiments and follow positive convincing results into a clinical setting to use autologous stem cells to support bone healing.

Indexed as

Bone DiseasesBone Marrow CellsBone SubstitutesCell- and Tissue-Based TherapyHumansOsteogenesisStem CellsTissue ScaffoldsTransplantation, AutologousBone SubstitutesBMCBone defectBone marrow mononuclear cellsCell therapyRegenerationStem cells

Identifiers

PMID29352347
PMCPMC6182650

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.