Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29352257›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2018

Robust phenotype prediction from gene expression data using differential shrinkage of co-regulated genes.

Kourosh Zarringhalam, David Degras, Christoph Brockel, Daniel Ziemek

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Assessment of genomic prediction capabilities of transcriptome data in a barley multi-parent RIL population.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Pheno-RNA, a method to associate genes with a specific phenotype, identifies genes linked to cellular transformation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kourosh ZarringhalamDepartment of Mathematics, University of Massachusetts Boston, Boston, MA, 02125, USA.
David DegrasDepartment of Mathematics, University of Massachusetts Boston, Boston, MA, 02125, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7221-584X
Christoph BrockelComputational Sciences, Pfizer Worldwide Research & Development, Cambridge, MA, 02139, USA.
Daniel ZiemekComputational Sciences, Pfizer Worldwide Research & Development, Cambridge, MA, 02139, USA. Daniel.Ziemek@pfizer.com.
Pfizer (United States) · USUniversity of Massachusetts Boston · US

Funding

UMass Boston-DF/HCC U54 Partnership (2 of 2)U54CA156734 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS BOSTON · PI ADAN COLON-CARMONA, Jill A. Macoska · 2010 to 2026
$24.9M
NCI NIH HHS U54 CA156734
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Discovery of robust diagnostic or prognostic biomarkers is a key to optimizing therapeutic benefit for select patient cohorts - an idea commonly referred to as precision medicine. Most discovery studies to derive such markers from high-dimensional transcriptomics datasets are weakly powered with sample sizes in the tens of patients. Therefore, highly regularized statistical approaches are essential to making generalizable predictions. At the same time, prior knowledge-driven approaches have been successfully applied to the manual interpretation of high-dimensional transcriptomics datasets. In this work, we assess the impact of combining two orthogonal approaches for the discovery of biomarker signatures, namely (1) well-known lasso-based regression approaches and its more recent derivative, the group lasso, and (2) the discovery of significant upstream regulators in literature-derived biological networks. Our method integrates both approaches in a weighted group-lasso model and differentially weights gene sets based on inferred active regulatory mechanism. Using nested cross-validation as well as independent clinical datasets, we demonstrate that our approach leads to increased accuracy and generalizable results. We implement our approach in a computationally efficient, user-friendly R package called creNET. The package can be downloaded at https://github.com/kouroshz/creNethttps://github.com/kouroshz/creNet and is accompanied by a parsed version of the STRING DB data base.

Indexed as

Gene Regulatory NetworksPhenotypeSoftwareBiomarkersHumansBiomarkers

Identifiers

PMID29352257
PMCPMC5775343
OpenAlexW2783251447

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.