ReviewNeurology2018
DNA damage response: Selected review and neurologic implications.
Review in Neurology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Overcoming Resistance to PARP Inhibitors in BRCA-Mutated Cancers: Mechanisms and Therapeutic Strategies.Journal of Cancer · 2026Review
- Tipping the PARylation scale: Dysregulation of PAR signaling in Huntington and neurodegenerative diseases.Journal of Huntington's disease · 2025Review
- Peptide Inhibitors Targeting FOXO4-p53 Interactions and Inducing Senescent Cancer Cell-specific Apoptosis.Journal of medicinal chemistry · 2025Article
- The Role of Nutrition, Oxidative Stress, and Trace Elements in the Pathophysiology of Autism Spectrum Disorders.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Neurological disease in xeroderma pigmentosum: prospective cohort study of its features and progression.Brain : a journal of neurology · 2023Article
- Crosstalk between Different DNA Repair Pathways Contributes to Neurodegenerative Diseases.Biology · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.