ArticleG3 (Bethesda, Md.)2018
The Highly Divergent Mitochondrial Genomes Indicate That the Booklouse,
Article in G3 (Bethesda, Md.), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- The relationship between taxonomic classification and applied entomology: stored product pests as a model group.Journal of insect science (Online) · 2025Review
- Article
- Comparative analyses of the fragmented mitochondrial genomes of wild pig louseInternational journal for parasitology. Parasites and wildlife · 2022Article
- Fragmentation in mitochondrial genomes in relation to elevated sequence divergence and extreme rearrangements.BMC biology · 2022Article
- Study on Gas Chromatographic Fingerprint of Essential Oil fromMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Characterization of the complete mitochondrial genome ofMitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources · 2021Article
- The First Complete Mitochondrial Genomes of Two Sibling Species from Nitidulid Beetles Pests.Insects · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The booklouse,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.