Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29352028›Full record

ReviewPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2018

The mysteries of remote memory.

Zimbul Albo, Johannes Gräff

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Directed cell-type recruitment during consolidation of a remote memory.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Distinct Contribution of Granular and Agranular Subdivisions of the Retrosplenial Cortex to Remote Contextual Fear Memory Retrieval.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Persistence of Fear Memory Depends on a Delayed Elevation of BAF53b and FGF1 Expression in the Lateral Amygdala.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Zimbul AlboLaboratory of Neuroepigenetics, Brain Mind Institute, School of Life Sciences, Ecole Polytechnique Féderale Lausanne, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-3690-2140
Johannes GräffLaboratory of Neuroepigenetics, Brain Mind Institute, School of Life Sciences, Ecole Polytechnique Féderale Lausanne, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland johannes.graeff@epfl.ch.ORCID 0000-0002-3219-3578

Funding

European Research Council 678832
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Long-lasting memories form the basis of our identity as individuals and lie central in shaping future behaviours that guide survival. Surprisingly, however, our current knowledge of how such memories are stored in the brain and retrieved, as well as the dynamics of the circuits involved, remains scarce despite seminal technical and experimental breakthroughs in recent years. Traditionally, it has been proposed that, over time, information initially learnt in the hippocampus is stored in distributed cortical networks. This process-the standard theory of memory consolidation-would stabilize the newly encoded information into a lasting memory, become independent of the hippocampus, and remain essentially unmodifiable throughout the lifetime of the individual. In recent years, several pieces of evidence have started to challenge this view and indicate that long-lasting memories might already

Indexed as

AnimalsCell NucleusMemory, Long-TermMiceSynapsesACCconsolidationepigeneticshippocampusmemoryremote memory

Identifiers

PMID29352028
PMCPMC5790827

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.