Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29351845›Full record

ArticleMolecular cell2018

A Precise Cdk Activity Threshold Determines Passage through the Restriction Point.

Clayton Schwarz, Amy Johnson, Mardo Kõivomägi, Evgeny Zatulovskiy, Carolyn J Kravitz, Andreas Doncic, Jan M Skotheim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular cell, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 67 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
67citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

67 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. CDC7 and APC/CNature communications · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Chromatin association promotes UBR5-mediated degradation of Rb.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. The GScience advances · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

7 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Clayton SchwarzDepartment of Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Amy JohnsonDepartment of Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Mardo KõivomägiDepartment of Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Evgeny ZatulovskiyDepartment of Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Carolyn J KravitzDepartment of Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Andreas DoncicDepartment of Cell Biology & Green Center for Systems Biology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390, USA.
Jan M SkotheimDepartment of Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA. Electronic address: skotheim@stanford.edu.

Funding

Supplement to Enhance Wellness and Resiliency in the Graduate EnvironmentT32GM007276 · NIGMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI MORRISON, ASHBY J. · 1985 to 2023
$32.9M
TRAINING & OUTREACH COREP50GM107615 · NIGMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI COVERT, MARKUS W · 2013 to 2017
$10.9M
Mechanisms of restriction point response to dynamic growth factor signalsR01GM092925 · NIGMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI SKOTHEIM, JAN M · 2010 to 2018
$2.8M
NIGMS NIH HHS P50 GM107615NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM092925NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007276
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

At the restriction point (R), mammalian cells irreversibly commit to divide. R has been viewed as a point in G1 that is passed when growth factor signaling initiates a positive feedback loop of Cdk activity. However, recent studies have cast doubt on this model by claiming R occurs prior to positive feedback activation in G1 or even before completion of the previous cell cycle. Here we reconcile these results and show that whereas many commonly used cell lines do not exhibit a G1 R, primary fibroblasts have a G1 R that is defined by a precise Cdk activity threshold and the activation of cell-cycle-dependent transcription. A simple threshold model, based solely on Cdk activity, predicted with more than 95% accuracy whether individual cells had passed R. That a single measurement accurately predicted cell fate shows that the state of complex regulatory networks can be assessed using a few critical protein activities.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell CycleCell Cycle CheckpointsCell Cycle ProteinsCell DivisionCell LineCyclin-Dependent Kinase 2Cyclin-Dependent KinasesFibroblastsG1 PhaseG1 Phase Cell Cycle CheckpointsHumansPhosphorylationPrimary Cell CultureSignal TransductionCDK2 protein, humanCell Cycle ProteinsCyclin-Dependent Kinase 2Cyclin-Dependent KinasesCdk2G1/SHDHBrestriction point

Identifiers

PMID29351845
PMCPMC5790185

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.