Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29351792›Full record

Trial reportTrials2018

Successful recruitment to trials: findings from the SCIMITAR+ Trial.

Emily Peckham, Catherine Arundel, Della Bailey, Tracy Callen, Christina Cusack, Suzanne Crosland, Penny Foster, Hannah Herlihy, James Hope, Suzy Ker and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyPragmatic Clinical TrialRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Trials, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. [Work sampling in ophthalmological clinical studies. A multicenter field study].Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 10 institutions in 1 country.

Emily PeckhamDepartment of Health Sciences, University of York, York, YO10 5DD, UK. emily.peckham@york.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9377-1968
Catherine ArundelDepartment of Health Sciences, University of York, York, YO10 5DD, UK.
Della BaileyDepartment of Health Sciences, University of York, York, YO10 5DD, UK.
Tracy CallenSolent NHS Trust, Portsmouth, PO3 6AD, UK.
Christina CusackOxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, OX3 7JX, UK.
Suzanne CroslandDepartment of Health Sciences, University of York, York, YO10 5DD, UK.
Penny FosterLancashire Care NHS Foundation Trust, Preston, PR2 8DW, UK.
Hannah HerlihyKent and Medway NHS and Social Care Partnership Trust, Maidstone, ME16 9PH, UK.
James HopeNorthumberland, Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle, NE3 3XT, UK.
Suzy KerTees, Esk and Wear Valleys NHS Foundation Trust, Harrogate, HG1 2PW, UK.
Tayla McCloudDivision of Psychiatry, University College London, London, WC1E 6BT, UK.
Crystal-Bella Romain-HooperLeeds York NHS Foundation Trust, Leeds, LS15 8ZB, UK.
Alison StriblingCambridgeshire and Peterborough NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, CB21 5EF, UK.
Peter PhiriSouthern Health NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, SO30 3JB, UK.
Ellen Tait2gether NHS Foundation Trust, Gloucester, GL1 1LY, UK.
Simon GilbodyDepartment of Health Sciences, University of York, York, YO10 5DD, UK.
SCIMITAR+ collaborative
University of York · GBCumbria Northumberland Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust · GBLeeds and York Partnership NHS Foundation Trust · GBSolent NHS Trust · GBSouthern Health NHS Foundation Trust · GBKent and Medway NHS and Social Care Partnership Trust · GBLancashire Care NHS Foundation Trust · GBOxford Health NHS Foundation Trust · GBTees, Esk and Wear Valleys NHS Foundation Trust · GBWildfowl & Wetlands Trust · GB

Funding

Department of Health HTA/11/136/52Health Technology Assessment Programme HTA 11/136/52
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRandomised controlled trials (RCT) can struggle to recruit to target on time. This is especially the case with hard to reach populations such as those with severe mental ill health. The SCIMITAR+ trial, a trial of a bespoke smoking cessation intervention for people with severe mental ill health achieved their recruitment ahead of time and target. This article reports strategies that helped us to achieve this with the aim of aiding others recruiting from similar populations.

methodsSCIMITAR+ is a multi-centre pragmatic two-arm parallel-group RCT, which aimed to recruit 400 participants with severe mental ill health who smoke and would like to cut down or quit. The study recruited primarily in secondary care through community mental health teams and psychiatrists with a smaller number of participants recruited through primary care. Recruitment opened in October 2015 and closed in December 2016, by which point 526 participants had been recruited. We gathered information from recruiting sites on strategies which led to the successful recruitment in SCIMITAR+ and in this article present our approach to trial management along with the strategies employed by the recruiting sites.

resultsAlongside having a dedicated trial manager and trial management team, we identified three main themes that led to successful recruitment. These were: clinicians with a positive attitude to research; researchers and clinicians working together; and the use of NHS targets. The overriding theme was the importance of relationships between both the researchers and the recruiting clinicians and the recruiting clinicians and the participants.

conclusionsThis study makes a significant contribution to the limited evidence base of real-world cases of successful recruitment to RCTs and offers practical guidance to those planning and conducting trials. Building positive relationships between clinicians, researchers and participants is crucial to successful recruitment.

Indexed as

Mental HealthPatient SelectionAttitude of Health PersonnelCooperative BehaviorEnglandHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansInterdisciplinary CommunicationMental DisordersPhysiciansResearch PersonnelSample SizeSmokersSmokingSmoking CessationTime FactorsBipolarPsychosisRandomised controlled trialRecruitmentSevere mental ill healthSmoking cessation

Identifiers

PMID29351792
PMCPMC5775553
OpenAlexW2784669892

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.