Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29351748›Full record

Trial reportBMC complementary and alternative medicine2018

A comparative study of three conservative treatments in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis: lumbar spinal stenosis with acupuncture and physical therapy study (LAP study).

Hiroyuki Oka, Ko Matsudaira, Yuichi Takano, Daichi Kasuya, Masaki Niiya, Juichi Tonosu, Masayoshi Fukushima, Yasushi Oshima, Tomoko Fujii, Sakae Tanaka and 1 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical TrialComparative Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC complementary and alternative medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04443738 (Long Term Follow up of Spinal Stenosis Inpatients Treated With Korean Integrative Medicine Treatment.), which is not on this map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04443738 completednot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Long Term Follow up of Spinal Stenosis Inpatients Treated With Korean Integrative Medicine Treatment.

TypeobservationalSponsorJaseng Medical FoundationRan2020 to 2020Enrolled378ConditionsSpinal Stenosis Lumbar, Medicine, Korean TraditionalArmsphone survey
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Acupuncture for radicular pain: a review of analgesic mechanism.Frontiers in molecular neuroscience · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hiroyuki OkaDepartment of Medical Research and Management for Musculoskeletal Pain, 22nd Century Medical & Research Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tokyo, Hongo 7-3-1, Bunkyo, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan. okah-tky@umin.ac.jp.
Ko MatsudairaDepartment of Medical Research and Management for Musculoskeletal Pain, 22nd Century Medical & Research Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tokyo, Hongo 7-3-1, Bunkyo, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan.
Yuichi TakanoDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Inanami Spine and Joint Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Daichi KasuyaAcupuncture and Moxibustion Section Central Rehabilitation Service, University of Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Masaki NiiyaDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Inanami Spine and Joint Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Juichi TonosuDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Inanami Spine and Joint Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Masayoshi FukushimaDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Inanami Spine and Joint Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Yasushi OshimaDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Inanami Spine and Joint Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Tomoko FujiiDepartment of Medical Research and Management for Musculoskeletal Pain, 22nd Century Medical & Research Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tokyo, Hongo 7-3-1, Bunkyo, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan.
Sakae TanakaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Hirohiko InanamiDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Inanami Spine and Joint Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
The University of Tokyo · JPUniversity of Tokyo Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough the efficiency of conservative management for lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) has been examined, different conservative management approaches have not been compared. We have performed the first comparative trial of three types of conservative management (medication with acetaminophen, exercise, and acupuncture) in Japanese patients with LSS.

methodsPatients with L5 root radiculopathy associated with LSS who visited our hospital for surgical treatment were enrolled between December 2011 and January 2014. In this open-label study, patients were assigned to three treatment groups (medication, exercise, acupuncture) according to the visit time. The primary outcomes were Zurich claudication questionnaire (ZCQ) scores before and after 4 weeks of treatment. Least square mean analysis was used to assess the following dependent variables in the treatment groups: changes in symptom severity and physical function scores of the ZCQ and the ZCQ score of patient's satisfaction after treatment.

resultsThirty-eight, 40, and 41 patients were allocated to the medication, exercise, and acupuncture groups, respectively. No patient underwent surgical treatment during the study period. The symptom severity scores of the ZCQ improved significantly after treatment in the medication (p = 0.048), exercise (p = 0.003), and acupuncture (p = 0.04) groups. The physical function score improved significantly in the acupuncture group (p = 0.045) but not in the medication (p = 0.20) and exercise (p = 0.29) groups. The mean reduction in the ZCQ score for physical function was significantly greater for acupuncture than for exercise. The mean ZCQ score for treatment satisfaction was significantly greater for acupuncture than for medication.

conclusionsAcupuncture was significantly more effective than physical exercise according to the physical function score of the ZCQ and than medication according to the satisfaction score. The present study provides new important information that will aid decision making in LSS treatment.

trial registrationThis study was registered with the UMIN Clinical Trials Registry ( UMIN000006957 ).

Indexed as

Acupuncture TherapyPhysical Therapy ModalitiesAgedConservative TreatmentFemaleHumansLumbar VertebraeMalePatient SatisfactionSpinal StenosisAcupunctureConservative managementExerciseLumbar spinal stenosisMedicationZurich claudication questionnaire

Identifiers

PMID29351748
PMCPMC5775532
OpenAlexW2800834778

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.