ArticleBMC genomics2018
Glutamate synthases from conifers: gene structure and phylogenetic studies.
Article in BMC genomics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Post-Translational Control of Nitrate Reductase Under Elevated COPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- A Key Metabolic Protein in Active Mycobacterium tuberculosis: Insights into Carbon, Nitrogen, and Sulfur Metabolism.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026Review
- Glutamine Synthetase and Glutamate Synthase Family Perform Diverse Physiological Functions in Exogenous Hormones and Abiotic Stress Responses inPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Genome-Wide Identification, Expression, and Protein Analysis of CKX and IPT Gene Families in Radish (International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Transcriptomic analysis of the response ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2024Article
- Article
- Mapping of quantitative trait loci for the nutritional value of fresh market tomato.Functional & integrative genomics · 2023Article
- Integrating multiomics data accelerates elucidation of plant primary and secondary metabolic pathways.aBIOTECH · 2023Review
- Genetic Diversity in Nitrogen Fertiliser Responses and N Gas Emission in Modern Wheat.Frontiers in plant science · 2022Article
- The Dynamics of NO3- and NH4+ Uptake in Duckweed Are Coordinated with the Expression of Major Nitrogen Assimilation Genes.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Multiple integrated metabolic strategies allow foraminiferan protists to thrive in anoxic marine sediments.Science advances · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPlants synthesize glutamate from ammonium by the combined activity of the enzymes glutamine synthetase (GS) and glutamate synthase (GOGAT) through the glutamate synthase cycle. In plants, there are two forms of glutamate synthases that differ in their electron donors, NADH-GOGAT (EC 1.4.1.14) and Fd-GOGAT (EC 1.4.7.1), which have differential roles either in primary ammonia assimilation or in the reassimilation of ammonium from different catabolic processes. Glutamate synthases are complex iron-sulfur flavoproteins containing functional domains involved in the control and coordination of their catalytic activities in annual plants. In conifers, partial cDNA sequences for GOGATs have been isolated and used for gene expression studies. However, knowledge of the gene structure and of phylogenetic relationships with other plant enzymes is quite scant.
resultsTechnological advances in conifer megagenomes sequencing have made it possible to obtain full-length cDNA sequences encoding Fd- and NADH-GOGAT from maritime pine, as well as BAC clones containing sequences for NADH-GOGAT and Fd-GOGAT genes. In the current study, we studied the genomic organization of pine GOGAT genes, the size of their exons/introns, copy numbers in the pine genome and relationships with other plant genes. Phylogenetic analysis was performed, and the degree of preservation and dissimilarity of key domains for the catalytic activities of these enzymes in different taxa were determined.
conclusionsFd- and NADH-GOGAT are encoded by single-copy genes in the maritime pine genome. The Fd-GOGAT gene is extremely large spanning more than 330 kb and the presence of very long introns highlights the important contribution of LTR retrotransposons to the gene size in conifers. In contrast, the structure of the NADH-GOGAT gene is similar to the orthologous genes in angiosperms. Our phylogenetic analysis indicates that these two genes had different origins during plant evolution. The results provide new insights into the structure and molecular evolution of these essential genes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.