Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29351565›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

SUMO targeting of a stress-tolerant Ulp1 SUMO protease.

Jennifer Peek, Catherine Harvey, Dreux Gray, Danny Rosenberg, Likhitha Kolla, Reuben Levy-Myers, Rui Yin, Jonathan L McMurry, Oliver Kerscher

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jennifer PeekBiology Department, The College of William & Mary, Williamsburg, Virginia, United States of America.
Catherine HarveyBiology Department, The College of William & Mary, Williamsburg, Virginia, United States of America.
Dreux GrayBiology Department, The College of William & Mary, Williamsburg, Virginia, United States of America.
Danny RosenbergBiology Department, The College of William & Mary, Williamsburg, Virginia, United States of America.
Likhitha KollaBiology Department, The College of William & Mary, Williamsburg, Virginia, United States of America.
Reuben Levy-MyersBiology Department, The College of William & Mary, Williamsburg, Virginia, United States of America.
Rui YinBiology Department, The College of William & Mary, Williamsburg, Virginia, United States of America.
Jonathan L McMurryDepartment of Molecular & Cellular Biology, Kennesaw State University, Kennesaw, Georgia, United States of America.
Oliver KerscherBiology Department, The College of William & Mary, Williamsburg, Virginia, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-6603-9352
William & Mary · USKennesaw State University · US

Funding

Cell-penetrating peptide-adaptors for intracellular cargo deliveryR15GM120691 · NIGMS · KENNESAW STATE UNIVERSITY · PI MCMURRY, JONATHAN L · 2016 to 2016
$402k
NIGMS NIH HHS R15 GM120691
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

SUMO proteases of the SENP/Ulp family are master regulators of both sumoylation and desumoylation and regulate SUMO homeostasis in eukaryotic cells. SUMO conjugates rapidly increase in response to cellular stress, including nutrient starvation, hypoxia, osmotic stress, DNA damage, heat shock, and other proteotoxic stressors. Nevertheless, little is known about the regulation and targeting of SUMO proteases during stress. To this end we have undertaken a detailed comparison of the SUMO-binding activity of the budding yeast protein Ulp1 (ScUlp1) and its ortholog in the thermotolerant yeast Kluyveromyces marxianus, KmUlp1. We find that the catalytic UD domains of both ScUlp1 and KmUlp1 show a high degree of sequence conservation, complement a ulp1Δ mutant in vivo, and process a SUMO precursor in vitro. Next, to compare the SUMO-trapping features of both SUMO proteases we produced catalytically inactive recombinant fragments of the UD domains of ScUlp1 and KmUlp1, termed ScUTAG and KmUTAG respectively. Both ScUTAG and KmUTAG were able to efficiently bind a variety of purified SUMO isoforms and bound immobilized SUMO1 with nanomolar affinity. However, KmUTAG showed a greatly enhanced ability to bind SUMO and SUMO-modified proteins in the presence of oxidative, temperature and other stressors that induce protein misfolding. We also investigated whether a SUMO-interacting motif (SIM) in the UD domain of KmULP1 that is not conserved in ScUlp1 may contribute to the SUMO-binding properties of KmUTAG. In summary, our data reveal important details about how SUMO proteases target and bind their sumoylated substrates, especially under stress conditions. We also show that the robust pan-SUMO binding features of KmUTAG can be exploited to detect and study SUMO-modified proteins in cell culture systems.

Indexed as

Amino Acid SequenceCatalytic DomainConserved SequenceCysteine EndopeptidasesFungal ProteinsGenetic Complementation TestKluyveromycesModels, MolecularMutant ProteinsProtein BindingProtein Processing, Post-TranslationalSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsSequence Homology, Amino AcidSmall Ubiquitin-Related Modifier ProteinsStress, PhysiologicalCysteine EndopeptidasesFungal ProteinsMutant ProteinsSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsSmall Ubiquitin-Related Modifier ProteinsUlp1 protease

Identifiers

PMID29351565
PMCPMC5774762
OpenAlexW2791845915

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.