Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29351560›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

The correlation of background parenchymal enhancement in the contralateral breast with patient and tumor characteristics of MRI-screen detected breast cancers.

Suzan Vreemann, Albert Gubern-Mérida, Cristina Borelli, Peter Bult, Nico Karssemeijer, Ritse M Mann

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Background parenchymal enhancement on breast MRI: A comprehensive review.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2020
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Suzan VreemannDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein 10, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-1981-1279
Albert Gubern-MéridaDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein 10, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Cristina BorelliDepartment of Radiology, Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza, San Giovanni Rotondo Foggia, Italy.
Peter BultDepartment of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Nico KarssemeijerDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein 10, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Ritse M MannDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein 10, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Radboud University Nijmegen · NLCasa Sollievo della Sofferenza · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeHigher background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) could be used for stratification of MRI screening programs since it might be related to a higher breast cancer risk. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to correlate BPE to patient and tumor characteristics in women with unilateral MRI-screen detected breast cancer who participated in an intermediate and high risk screening program. As BPE in the affected breast may be difficult to discern from enhancing cancer, we assumed that BPE in the contralateral breast is a representative measure for BPE in women with unilateral breast cancer. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis retrospective study was approved by our local institutional board and a waiver for consent was granted. MR-examinations of women with unilateral breast cancers screen-detected on breast MRI were evaluated by two readers. BPE in the contralateral breast was rated according to BI-RADS. Univariate analyses were performed to study associations. Observer variability was computed.

resultsAnalysis included 77 breast cancers in 76 patients (age: 48±9.8 years), including 62 invasive and 15 pure ductal carcinoma in-situ cases. A negative association between BPE and tumor grade (p≤0.016) and a positive association with progesterone status (p≤0.021) was found. The correlation was stronger when only considering invasive disease. Inter-reader agreement was substantial.

conclusionLower BPE in the contralateral breast in women with unilateral breast cancer might be associated to higher tumor grade and progesterone receptor negativity. Great care should be taken using BPE for stratification of patients to tailored screening programs.

Indexed as

AdultAgedBreastBreast NeoplasmsCarcinoma, Ductal, BreastCarcinoma, Intraductal, NoninfiltratingCarcinoma, LobularContrast MediaEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMass ScreeningMiddle AgedMutationRetrospective StudiesContrast Media

Identifiers

PMID29351560
PMCPMC5774774
OpenAlexW2790562669

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.