ReviewPloS one2018
Visualized analysis of developing trends and hot topics in natural disaster research.
Review in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Past, present, and future perspectives of biodegradable films for soil: A 30-year systematic review.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022Pooled it
- Research on the deformation mechanisms of accumulated landslides induced by different rain patterns based on flume model tests.PloS one · 2025Article
- Global trends in research of high-throughput sequencing technology associated with chronic wounds from 2002 to 2022: A bibliometric and visualized study.Frontiers in surgery · 2023Article
- Low-carbon alcohol fuels for decarbonizing the road transportation industry: a bibliometric analysis 2000-2021.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2022Article
- Effect of operational exercises on nurses' competence in dealing with disaster.Journal of education and health promotion · 2022Article
- Global Trends in Natural Biopolymers in the 21st Century: A Scientometric Review.Frontiers in chemistry · 2022Review
- Global Research on Hereditary Hearing Impairment Over the Last 40 Years: A Bibliometric Study.The journal of international advanced otology · 2021Review
- Knowledge map and global trends in extreme weather research from 1980 to 2019: a bibliometric analysis.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2021Article
- Science maps for exploration, navigation, and reflection-A graphic approach to strategic thinking.PloS one · 2021Article
- Bibliometric analysis of trends and issues in traditional medicine for stroke research: 2004-2018.BMC complementary medicine and therapies · 2020Article
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study visualized and analyzed the developing trends and hot topics in natural disaster research. 19694 natural disaster-related articles (January 1900 to June 2015) are indexed in the Web of Science database. The first step in this study is using complex networks to visualize and analyze these articles. CiteSpace and Gephi were employed to generate a countries collaboration network and a disciplines collaboration network, and then attached hot topics to countries and disciplines, respectively. The results show that USA, China, and Italy are the three major contributors to natural disaster research. "Prediction model", "social vulnerability", and "landslide inventory map" are three hot topics in recent years. They have attracted attention not only from large countries like China but also from small countries like Panama and Turkey. Comparing two hybrid networks provides details of natural disaster research. Scientists from USA and China use image data to research earthquakes. Indonesia and Germany collaboratively study tsunamis in the Indian Ocean. However, Indonesian studies focus on modeling and simulations, while German research focuses on early warning technology. This study also introduces an activity index (AI) and an attractive index (AAI) to generate time evolution trajectories of some major countries from 2000 to 2013 and evaluate their trends and performance. Four patterns of evolution are visible during this 14-year period. China and India show steadily rising contributions and impacts, USA and England show relatively decreasing research efforts and impacts, Japan and Australia show fluctuating activities and stable attraction, and Spain and Germany show fluctuating activities and increasing impacts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.