Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29351303›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Automated inverse optimization facilitates lower doses to normal tissue in pancreatic stereotactic body radiotherapy.

Ivaylo B Mihaylov, Eric A Mellon, Raphael Yechieli, Lorraine Portelance

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Automated treatment planning for liver cancer stereotactic body radiotherapy.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2023
    Article
  3. Artificial Intelligence in Radiation Therapy.IEEE transactions on radiation and plasma medical sciences · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ivaylo B MihaylovDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Miami,Miami, FL, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-4518-5902
Eric A MellonDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Miami,Miami, FL, United States of America.
Raphael YechieliDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Miami,Miami, FL, United States of America.
Lorraine PortelanceDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Miami,Miami, FL, United States of America.

Funding

Improving Cancer Treatment Planning by DMH-Based Inverse OptimizationR01CA163370 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI MIHAYLOV, IVAYLO B · 2012 to 2017
$1.5M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA163370
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeInverse planning is trial-and-error iterative process. This work introduces a fully automated inverse optimization approach, where the treatment plan is closely tailored to the unique patient anatomy. The auto-optimization is applied to pancreatic stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). MATERIALS AND

methodsThe automation is based on stepwise reduction of dose-volume histograms (DVHs). Five uniformly spaced points, from 1% to 70% of the organ at risk (OAR) volumes, are used. Doses to those DVH points are iteratively decreased through multiple optimization runs. With each optimization run the doses to the OARs are decreased, while the dose homogeneity over the target is increased. The iterative process is terminated when a pre-specified dose heterogeneity over the target is reached. Twelve pancreatic cases were retrospectively studied. Doses to the target, maximum doses to duodenum, bowel, stomach, and spinal cord were evaluated. In addition, mean doses to liver and kidneys were tallied. The auto-optimized plans were compared to the actual treatment plans, which are based on national protocols.

resultsThe prescription dose to 95% of the planning target volume (PTV) is the same for the treatment and the auto-optimized plans. The average difference for maximum doses to duodenum, bowel, stomach, and spinal cord are -4.6 Gy, -1.8 Gy, -1.6 Gy, and -2.4 Gy respectively. The negative sign indicates lower doses with the auto-optimization. The average differences in the mean doses to liver and kidneys are -0.6 Gy, and -1.1 Gy to -1.5 Gy respectively.

conclusionsAutomated inverse optimization holds great potential for personalization and tailoring of radiotherapy to particular patient anatomies. It can be utilized for normal tissue sparing or for an isotoxic dose escalation.

Indexed as

AutomationRadiotherapy DosageHumansPancreasPancreatic NeoplasmsRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID29351303
PMCPMC5774747

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.