Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29351291›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Allometric biomass equations for 12 tree species in coniferous and broadleaved mixed forests, Northeastern China.

Huaijiang He, Chunyu Zhang, Xiuhai Zhao, Folega Fousseni, Jinsong Wang, Haijun Dai, Song Yang, Qiang Zuo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Huaijiang HeKey Laboratory for Forest Resources & Ecosystem Processes, Beijing Forestry University, Haidian District, Beijing, China.
Chunyu ZhangKey Laboratory for Forest Resources & Ecosystem Processes, Beijing Forestry University, Haidian District, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0002-9068-3487
Xiuhai ZhaoKey Laboratory for Forest Resources & Ecosystem Processes, Beijing Forestry University, Haidian District, Beijing, China.
Folega FousseniKey Laboratory for Forest Resources & Ecosystem Processes, Beijing Forestry University, Haidian District, Beijing, China.
Jinsong WangKey Laboratory for Forest Resources & Ecosystem Processes, Beijing Forestry University, Haidian District, Beijing, China.
Haijun DaiKey Laboratory for Forest Resources & Ecosystem Processes, Beijing Forestry University, Haidian District, Beijing, China.
Song YangKey Laboratory for Forest Resources & Ecosystem Processes, Beijing Forestry University, Haidian District, Beijing, China.
Qiang ZuoKey Laboratory for Forest Resources & Ecosystem Processes, Beijing Forestry University, Haidian District, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding forest carbon budget and dynamics for sustainable resource management and ecosystem functions requires quantification of above- and below-ground biomass at individual tree species and stand levels. In this study, a total of 122 trees (9-12 per species) were destructively sampled to determine above- and below-ground biomass of 12 tree species (Acer mandshuricum, Acer mono, Betula platyphylla, Carpinus cordata, Fraxinus mandshurica, Juglans mandshurica, Maackia amurensis, P. koraiensis, Populus ussuriensis, Quercus mongolica, Tilia amurensis and Ulmus japonica) in coniferous and broadleaved mixed forests of Northeastern China, an area of the largest natural forest in the country. Biomass allocation was examined and biomass models were developed using diameter as independent variable for individual tree species and all species combined. The results showed that the largest biomass allocation of all species combined was on stems (57.1%), followed by coarse root (21.3%), branch (18.7%), and foliage (2.9%). The log-transformed model was statistically significant for all biomass components, although predicting power was higher for species-specific models than for all species combined, general biomass models, and higher for stems, roots, above-ground biomass, and total tree biomass than for branch and foliage biomass. These findings supplement the previous studies on this forest type by additional sample trees, species and locations, and support biomass research on forest carbon budget and dynamics by management activities such as thinning and harvesting in the northeastern part of China.

Indexed as

BiomassForestsChinaModels, TheoreticalPlant StructuresSpecies SpecificityTrees

Identifiers

PMID29351291
PMCPMC5774681

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.