Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29351139›Full record

Trial reportJournal of addiction medicine

A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial of a Phone-based Intervention for Smoking Cessation and Relapse Prevention in the Postpartum Period.

Victoria H Coleman-Cowger, Katrina S Mark, Zachary R Rosenberry, Bartosz Koszowski, Mishka Terplan

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of addiction medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Relapse prevention interventions for smoking cessation.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Victoria H Coleman-CowgerBattelle Public Health Center for Tobacco Research, Baltimore, MD (VHC-C, ZRR, BK); University of Maryland Baltimore, Baltimore, MD (KSM); Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA (MT).
Katrina S Mark
Zachary R Rosenberry
Bartosz Koszowski
Mishka Terplan
University of Maryland, Baltimore · US

Funding

Phone-Based Postpartum Continuing Care: Smoking Cessation Beginning in PregnancyR34DA032683 · NIDA · CHESTNUT HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC. · PI COLEMAN-COWGER, VICTORIA HOPE · 2012 to 2014
$676k
NIDA NIH HHS R34 DA032683
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo pilot-test a Phone-based Postpartum Continuing Care (PPCC) protocol developed from existing evidence-based approaches to address both postpartum smoking relapse among low-income women who quit smoking during pregnancy and postpartum smoking increase among those who had cut down.

methodsOne hundred thirty low-income pregnant women who were current or recently quit tobacco smokers were recruited at their first prenatal appointment and randomized to either a Control (standard care) or Experimental (standard care + PPCC) group. An intent-to-treat analysis was conducted on biochemically verified data from 6 in-person interviews during pregnancy and postpartum. Feasibility with regard to recruitment, randomization, assessment, and implementation of PPCC were assessed, along with acceptability among the target population.

resultsPPCC was found to be feasible and acceptable to some participants, but not all. There were no significant differences in tobacco products per day at 6 months postpartum between groups; however, effect sizes differed at 6 weeks compared with 6 months postpartum. Similarly, there were no significant differences between groups in cessation rate (24% in each group) and past 90-day tobacco use (59 vs 55 days, for Control and Experimental groups, respectively).

conclusionsThe PPCC intervention did not differentially reduce tobacco use postpartum compared with a controlled comparison group, though it was found to be acceptable among a subpopulation of low-income pregnant women and feasible with regard to recruitment, randomization, assessment procedures, and implementation. Further research is needed to identify an intervention that significantly improves smoking relapse rates postpartum.

Indexed as

CravingPostpartum PeriodTelephoneAdultCotinineFemaleHumansPilot ProjectsPovertyPregnancyRecurrenceSmokingSmoking CessationSmoking PreventionYoung AdultCotinine

Identifiers

PMID29351139
PMCPMC5970014
OpenAlexW2794346586

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.