Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29351057›Full record

ArticleRadiation research2018

Global Gene Expression Response in Mouse Models of DNA Repair Deficiency after Gamma Irradiation.

Nils Rudqvist, Evagelia C Laiakis, Shanaz A Ghandhi, Suresh Kumar, Jeffrey D Knotts, Mashkura Chowdhury, Albert J Fornace, Sally A Amundson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Radiation research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The transcriptomic revolution and radiation biology.International journal of radiation biology · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nils Rudqvista   Center for Radiological Research, Columbia University Medical Center, Columbia University, New York, New York.
Evagelia C Laiakisb   Department of Biochemistry and Molecular and Cellular Biology, Georgetown University, Washington, DC.
Shanaz A Ghandhia   Center for Radiological Research, Columbia University Medical Center, Columbia University, New York, New York.
Suresh Kumara   Center for Radiological Research, Columbia University Medical Center, Columbia University, New York, New York.
Jeffrey D Knottsa   Center for Radiological Research, Columbia University Medical Center, Columbia University, New York, New York.
Mashkura Chowdhurya   Center for Radiological Research, Columbia University Medical Center, Columbia University, New York, New York.
Albert J Fornaceb   Department of Biochemistry and Molecular and Cellular Biology, Georgetown University, Washington, DC.
Sally A Amundsona   Center for Radiological Research, Columbia University Medical Center, Columbia University, New York, New York.
Columbia University Irving Medical Center · USGeorgetown University · US

Funding

Sample Engineering CoreU19AI067773 · NIAID · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI FORNACE, ALBERT J · 2005 to 2024
$105.4M
NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI067773
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the event of an improvised nuclear device or "dirty bomb" in a highly populated area, potentially hundreds of thousands of people will require screening to ensure that exposed individuals receive appropriate treatment. For this reason, there is a need to develop tools for high-throughput radiation biodosimetry. Gene expression represents an emerging approach to biodosimetry and could potentially provide an estimate of both absorbed dose and individual radiation-induced injury. Since approximately 2-4% of humans are thought to be radiosensitive, and would suffer greater radiological injury at a given dose than members of the general population, it is of interest to explore the potential impact of such sensitivity on the biodosimetric gene expression signatures being developed. In this study, we used wild-type mice and genetically engineered mouse models deficient in two DNA repair pathways that can contribute to radiation sensitivity to estimate the maximum effect of differences in radiosensitivity. We compared gene expression in response to a roughly equitoxic (LD

Indexed as

AnimalsDNA RepairGamma RaysGene OntologyMicePhenotypeTranscriptome

Identifiers

PMID29351057
PMCPMC5954417
OpenAlexW2785064857

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.