Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29350744›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomechanical engineering2018

Preventing Mesh Pore Collapse by Designing Mesh Pores With Auxetic Geometries: A Comprehensive Evaluation Via Computational Modeling.

Katrina M Knight, Pamela A Moalli, Steven D Abramowitch

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomechanical engineering, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Chapter 4.5: New Proposed Treatments for Pelvic Organ Prolapse.International urogynecology journal · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Katrina M KnightDepartment of Bioengineering, Musculoskeletal Research Center, University of Pittsburgh, 405 Center for Bioengineering 300 Technology Drive, Pittsburgh, PA 15219 e-mail: .
Pamela A MoalliDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Magee-Womens Research Institute, Magee Womens Hospital, University of Pittsburgh, 204 Craft Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 e-mail: .
Steven D AbramowitchDepartment of Bioengineering, Musculoskeletal Research Center, University of Pittsburgh, Magee-Womens Research Institute, Magee-Womens Hospital, University of Pittsburgh, 309 Center for Bioengineering 300 Technology Drive, Pittsburgh, PA 15219 e-mail: .

Funding

Porosity and tensioning: Critical factors to consider when choosing a prolapse meshR01HD083383 · NICHD · MAGEE-WOMEN'S RES INST AND FOUNDATION · PI ABRAMOWITCH, STEVEN D, MOALLI, PAMELA A. · 2016 to 2025
$5.5M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD083383
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) meshes are exposed to predominately tensile loading conditions in vivo that can lead to pore collapse by 70-90%, decreasing overall porosity and providing a plausible mechanism for the contraction/shrinkage of mesh observed following implantation. To prevent pore collapse, we proposed to design synthetic meshes with a macrostructure that results in auxetic behavior, the pores expand laterally, instead of contracting when loaded. Such behavior can be achieved with a range of auxetic structures/geometries. This study utilized finite element analysis (FEA) to assess the behavior of mesh models with eight auxetic pore geometries subjected to uniaxial loading to evaluate their potential to allow for pore expansion while simultaneously providing resistance to tensile loading. Overall, substituting auxetic geometries for standard pore geometries yielded more pore expansion, but often at the expense of increased model elongation, with two of the eight auxetics not able to maintain pore expansion at higher levels of tension. Meshes with stable pore geometries that remain open with loading will afford the ingrowth of host tissue into the pores and improved integration of the mesh. Given the demonstrated ability of auxetic geometries to allow for pore size maintenance (and pore expansion), auxetically designed meshes have the potential to significantly impact surgical outcomes and decrease the likelihood of major mesh-related complications.

Indexed as

Computer SimulationMaterials TestingProsthesis DesignProsthesis FailureSurgical MeshComputer-Aided DesignFinite Element AnalysisPelvic Organ ProlapsePorosityTensile Strength

Identifiers

PMID29350744
PMCPMC7104754

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.