Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29350638›Full record

ReviewActa bio-medica : Atenei Parmensis2018

Weight-bearing MRI of the knee: a review of advantages and limits.

Federico Bruno, Antonio Barile, Francesco Arrigoni, Antonella Laporta, Anna Russo, Marina Carotti, Alessandra Splendiani, Ernesto Di Cesare, Carlo Masciocchi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Acta bio-medica : Atenei Parmensis, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Validation of an MRI Technique for the 6-DOF Knee Kinematics Measurement.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Federico Bruno. federico.bruno.1988@gmail.com.
Antonio Barile
Francesco Arrigoni
Antonella Laporta
Anna Russo
Marina Carotti
Alessandra Splendiani
Ernesto Di Cesare
Carlo Masciocchi

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Standard knee imaging with MRI is usually performed with patient in recumbent position under non-weight-bearing conditions. Recently, magnetic resonance imaging systems to scan the knee joint under weight bearing conditions has been proposed as an approach to improve the clinical utility of musculoskeletal MRI. Imaging under loading can be useful to understand the natural motion behavior of the knee joint and to identify conditions that are challenging to diagnose by using standard position. We reviewed the literature on weight-bearing MR imaging of the knee to describe the current state of use of such MRI technologies, evaluating the advantages and the potential limitations of these technologies.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingAnterior Cruciate Ligament InjuriesBiomechanical PhenomenaHumansKnee JointMenisci, TibialOsteoarthritis, KneePatellofemoral JointWeight-BearingMagnetic Resonance Imaging, weight-bearing MRI, knee pathology

Identifiers

PMID29350638
PMCPMC6179065

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.