ArticleThe American journal of managed care2018
Electronic health record "super-users" and "under-users" in ambulatory care practices.
Article in The American journal of managed care, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- After-visit and discharge summaries: a scoping review of stakeholder perspectives and experiences.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- Workflow Improvement of Electronic Health Record Usage in a Tertiary Pediatric Burns Clinic.Applied clinical informatics · 2023Observational
- Resolving Key Barriers to Advancing Mental Health Equity in Rural Communities Using Digital Mental Health Interventions.JAMA health forum · 2021Article
- Development of a multilevel intervention to increase colorectal cancer screening in Appalachia.Implementation science communications · 2021Article
- Assessment of Variation in Electronic Health Record Capabilities and Reported Clinical Quality Performance in Ambulatory Care Clinics, 2014-2017.JAMA network open · 2021Article
- Challenges involved in establishing a web-based clinical decision support tool in community health centers.Healthcare (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2020Article
- Survey of psychiatrist use of digital technology in clinical practice.International journal of bipolar disorders · 2020Article
- Trends in the use of computerized physician order entry by health-system affiliated ambulatory clinics in the United States, 2014-2016.BMC health services research · 2020Article
- Late adopters of the electronic health record should move now.BMJ quality & safety · 2020Review
- The use of technology to promote vaccination: A social ecological model based framework.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesThis study explored variation in the extent of use of electronic health record (EHR)-based health information technology (IT) functionalities across US ambulatory care practices. Use of health IT functionalities in ambulatory care is important for delivering high-quality care, including that provided in coordination with multiple practitioners. STUDY
designWe used data from the 2014 Healthcare Information and Management Systems Society Analytics survey. The responses of 30,123 ambulatory practices with an operational EHR were analyzed to examine the extent of use of EHR-based health IT functionalities for each practice.
methodsWe created a novel framework for classifying ambulatory care practices employing 7 domains of health IT functionality. Drawing from the survey responses, we created a composite "use" variable indicating the extent of health IT functionality use across these domains. "Super-user" practices were defined as having near-full employment of the 7 domains of health IT functionalities and "under-users" as those with minimal or no use of health IT functionalities. We used multivariable logistic regression to investigate how the odds of super-use and under-use varied by practice size, type, urban or rural location, and geographic region.
resultsSeventy-three percent of practices were not using EHR technologies to their full capability, and nearly 40% were classified as under-users. Under-user practices were more likely to be of smaller size, situated in the West, and located outside a metropolitan area.
conclusionsTo achieve the broader benefits of the EHR and health IT, health systems and policy makers need to identify and address barriers to full use of health IT functionalities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
29350506PMC6556122What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.