Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29350339›Full record

ReviewCurrent treatment options in gastroenterology2018

Emerging Insights into the Esophageal Microbiome.

Michael May, Julian A Abrams

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current treatment options in gastroenterology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed
7.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 77 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Therapeutic Evaluation ofNutrients · 2024
    Trial
  2. The oesophagus as an immune organ.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Intratumoral microbiota: a new force in the development and treatment of esophageal cancer.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2025
    Review
  6. Low Bacterial Biomass in Human Pancreatic Cancer and Adjacent Normal Tissue.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Microbial Dysbiosis in Achalasia: Insights on How to Prevent Cancer.Journal of neurogastroenterology and motility · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Michael MayDepartment of Medicine, Columbia University College of Physicians & Surgeons, 630 W 168th Street, P&S 3-401, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
Julian A AbramsDepartment of Medicine, Columbia University College of Physicians & Surgeons, 630 W 168th Street, P&S 3-401, New York, NY, 10032, USA. ja660@cumc.columbia.edu.
Columbia University · US

Funding

Weight loss-induced Microbiome and Adipokine Changes in Barrett's EsophagusU54CA163004 · NCI · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI ABRAMS, JULIAN, RUSTGI, ANIL K · 2011 to 2022
$12.5M
NCI NIH HHS U54 CA163004
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewAnalysis of the esophageal microbiome remains a relatively new field of research, and most studies to date have focused on characterizing the esophageal microbiome in states of health and disease. Microbiome alterations have been implicated in the pathogenesis of inflammatory and neoplastic conditions in the colon and elsewhere in the gastrointestinal tract. The epidemiology of various esophageal conditions including Barrett's esophagus (BE), esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC), esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), and eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) point to the microbiome as a potential co-factor in disease pathogenesis, and the possibility exists that these microbiome alterations could contribute directly to the inflammatory environments necessary for the carcinogenesis or atopy involved in these conditions. RECENT

findingsThe native esophageal microbiome is similar in composition to the oral microbiome, with a high relative abundance of the phylum Firmicutes and the genus Streptococcus. Limited studies to date suggest that there are certain microbiome alterations associated with esophageal diseases. Additionally, it may be possible to indirectly assess the esophageal microbiome via non-endoscopic means. This raises the possibility that non-invasive microbiome analysis could be used for disease screening and monitoring. Further understanding of the role of the esophageal microbiome in disease pathogenesis, as well as methods for microbiome alteration, may help elucidate future targets for disease modifying therapies, or minimally invasive screening tools in patients at high risk for development of various esophageal conditions.

Indexed as

Barrett’s esophagusEosinophilic esophagitisEsophageal cancerMicrobiome

Identifiers

PMID29350339
PMCPMC5843540
OpenAlexW2793972804

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.