Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29350336›Full record

SynthesisDrugs & aging2018

Brain Over Bladder: A Systematic Review of Dual Cholinesterase Inhibitor and Urinary Anticholinergic Use.

Laura K Triantafylidis, Jenna S Clemons, Emily P Peron, John Roefaro, Kristin M Zimmerman

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Drugs & aging, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Treatment of bladder dysfunction with solifenacin: is there a risk of dementia or cognitive impairment?Brazilian journal of medical and biological research = Revista brasileira de pesquisas medicas e biologica · 2022
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Laura K TriantafylidisDepartment of Pharmacy, VA Boston Healthcare System, 150 S Huntington Avenue, Jamaica Plain, MA, 02130, USA. lkd07001@gmail.com.
Jenna S ClemonsClinical Pharmacy Services, Kaiser Permanente Mid-Atlantic, 6501 Loisdale Ct, Springfield, VA, 22150, USA.
Emily P PeronDepartment of Pharmacotherapy and Outcomes Science, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Pharmacy, 410 N. 12th Street, PO Box 980533, Richmond, VA, 23298-0533, USA.
John RoefaroDepartment of Pharmacy, VA Boston Healthcare System, 150 S Huntington Avenue, Jamaica Plain, MA, 02130, USA.
Kristin M ZimmermanDepartment of Pharmacotherapy and Outcomes Science, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Pharmacy, 410 N. 12th Street, PO Box 980533, Richmond, VA, 23298-0533, USA.
VA Boston Healthcare System · USVirginia Commonwealth University · USKaiser Permanente · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCase reports have demonstrated that dual use of cholinesterase inhibitors (ChIs) and urinary anticholinergics (UAChs) in older adults may be associated with delusions, aggression, changes in cognition, and anxiety, which typically resolve on drug discontinuation. Despite opposing mechanisms of action, these drugs continue to be co-prescribed.

objectiveThis systematic review evaluates cognitive and functional outcomes of dual use of ChIs and UAChs and describes its prevalence. PATIENTS AND

methodsA literature search using terms related to ChIs and UAChs was conducted. Observational or interventional studies evaluating cognitive or functional outcomes in subjects receiving dual therapy were included for the primary aim. Articles describing prevalence of dual use were included for the secondary aim.

resultsOf 1340 unique results, five studies met the inclusion criteria for the primary aim. Four of the studies assessed cognitive outcomes-three failed to identify a significant difference in cognitive function with dual use and the fourth study observed a statistically significant improvement in cognition with dual use of high-dose donepezil and solifenacin when compared with baseline. Three studies assessed functional outcomes-one revealed a 50% greater quarterly decline in activities of daily living (p = 0.01) among dual users functioning in the top quartile, another revealed significant functional improvement in dual users, and the final study did not demonstrate a significant difference. Seventeen articles were included for the secondary aim. Prevalence of dual use ranged from 1.2 to 40.5%.

conclusionThis systematic review revealed a high prevalence of dual use of ChIs and UAChs; however, there are mixed results for cognitive and functional outcomes. Results were limited by methodological flaws. Observational or interventional studies assessing dual users are lacking and further study of cognitive and functional risks of dual ChI and UACh use is needed.

Indexed as

Activities of Daily LivingAge FactorsCholinergic AntagonistsCholinesterase InhibitorsCognitionCognition DisordersDementiaDrug InteractionsHumansUrinary IncontinenceCholinergic AntagonistsCholinesterase Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID29350336
OpenAlexW2788198738

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.