Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29350267›Full record

ReviewLangenbeck's archives of surgery2018

Modern work-up and extended resection in perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: the AMC experience.

F Rassam, E Roos, K P van Lienden, J E van Hooft, H J Klümpen, G van Tienhoven, R J Bennink, M R Engelbrecht, A Schoorlemmer, U H W Beuers and 4 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Langenbeck's archives of surgery, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
11.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 117 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

F RassamDepartment of Surgery, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. f.rassam@amc.uva.nl.
E RoosDepartment of Surgery, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
K P van LiendenDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
J E van HooftDepartment of Gastroenterology & Hepatology and Tytgat Institute for Liver and Intestinal Research, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
H J KlümpenDepartment of Medical Oncology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
G van TienhovenDepartment of Radiotherapy, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
R J BenninkDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
M R EngelbrechtDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
A SchoorlemmerDepartment of Surgery, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
U H W BeuersDepartment of Gastroenterology & Hepatology and Tytgat Institute for Liver and Intestinal Research, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
J VerheijDepartment of Pathology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
M G BesselinkDepartment of Surgery, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
O R BuschDepartment of Surgery, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
T M van GulikDepartment of Surgery, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Academic Medical Center · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimPerihilar cholangiocarcinoma (PHC) is a challenging disease and requires aggressive surgical treatment in order to achieve curation. The assessment and work-up of patients with presumed PHC is multidisciplinary, complex and requires extensive experience. The aim of this paper is to review current aspects of diagnosis, preoperative work-up and extended resection in patients with PHC from the perspective of our own institutional experience with this complex tumor.

methodsWe provided a review of applied modalities in the diagnosis and work-up of PHC according to current literature. All patients with presumed PHC in our center between 2000 and 2016 were identified and described. The types of resection, surgical techniques and outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS AND

conclusionUpcoming diagnostic modalities such as Spyglass and combinations of serum biomarkers and molecular markers have potential to decrease the rate of misdiagnosis of benign, inflammatory disease. Assessment of liver function with hepatobiliary scintigraphy provides better information on the future remnant liver (FRL) than volume alone. The selective use of staging laparoscopy is advisable to avoid futile laparotomies. In patients requiring extended resection, selective preoperative biliary drainage is mandatory in cholangitis and when FRL is small (< 50%). Preoperative portal vein embolization (PVE) is used when FRL volume is less than 40% and optionally includes the left portal vein branches to segment 4. Associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) as alternative to PVE is not recommended in PHC. N2 positive lymph nodes preclude long-term survival. The benefit of unconditional en bloc resection of the portal vein bifurcation is uncertain. Along these lines, an aggressive surgical approach encompassing extended liver resection including segment 1, regional lymphadenectomy and conditional portal venous resection translates into favorable long-term survival.

Indexed as

Bile Duct NeoplasmsDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleHepatectomyHumansKlatskin TumorLigationLiver Function TestsMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMultimodal ImagingPortal VeinPositron-Emission TomographyPreoperative CarePrognosisRisk AssessmentBiliary drainageBiomarkersDiagnosisHepato-biliary scintigraphyKlatskin tumorPerihilar cholangiocarcinomaPostoperative outcomePreoperative assessmentStagingSurgical resection

Identifiers

PMID29350267
PMCPMC5986829
OpenAlexW2789738869

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.