Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29349875›Full record

ReviewCPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology2018

Preclinical QSP Modeling in the Pharmaceutical Industry: An IQ Consortium Survey Examining the Current Landscape.

Marjoleen J M A Nijsen, Fan Wu, Loveleena Bansal, Erica Bradshaw-Pierce, Jason R Chan, Bianca M Liederer, Jerome T Mettetal, Patricia Schroeder, Edgar Schuck, Alice Tsai and 7 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. A Framework for Quantitative Systems Pharmacology Model Execution.Handbook of experimental pharmacology · 2025
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. What Is QSP and Why Does It Exist?: A Brief History.Handbook of experimental pharmacology · 2025
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Current practices for QSP model assessment: an IQ consortium survey.Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics · 2024
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Hallmarks of neurodegenerative disease: A systems pharmacology perspective.CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology · 2022
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Marjoleen J M A NijsenAbbvie Inc, North Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Fan WuNovartis Institutes for Biomedical Research, East Hanover, New Jersey, USA.
Loveleena BansalGlaxoSmithKline, King of Prussia, Philadelphia, USA.
Erica Bradshaw-PierceTakeda, San Diego, California, USA.
Jason R ChanEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Bianca M LiedererGenentech Inc., South San Francisco, California, USA.
Jerome T MettetalAstraZeneca, Drug Safety and Metabolism, IMED Biotech Unit, AstraZeneca, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Patricia SchroederBiogen, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Edgar SchuckEisai Inc, Woodcliff Lake, New Jersey, USA.
Alice TsaiVertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Christine XuSanofi, Bridgewater, New jersey, USA.
Anjaneya ChimalakondaBristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.
Kha LeAgios, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Mark PenneyUCB, Celltech, Slough, Berkshire, United Kingdom.
Brian ToppMerck & Co., Inc, Kenilworth, New Jersey, USA.
Akihiro YamadaAstellas Pharma Inc., Tokyo, Japan.
Mary E SpilkerPfizer Worldwide Research and Development, San Diego, California, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A cross-industry survey was conducted to assess the landscape of preclinical quantitative systems pharmacology (QSP) modeling within pharmaceutical companies. This article presents the survey results, which provide insights on the current state of preclinical QSP modeling in addition to future opportunities. Our results call attention to the need for an aligned definition and consistent terminology around QSP, yet highlight the broad applicability and benefits preclinical QSP modeling is currently delivering.

Indexed as

Drug DesignDrug DiscoveryDrug Evaluation, PreclinicalDrug IndustryHumansModels, BiologicalPharmacology, ClinicalSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID29349875
PMCPMC5869550

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.