Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29349772›Full record

ArticleHealth services research2018

Does the Use of Diagnostic Technology Reduce Fetal Mortality?

Jostein Grytten, Irene Skau, Rune Sørensen, Anne Eskild

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health services research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05059093 (Developing and Testing Deep Learning Models for Fetal Biometry and Amniotic Volume Assessment in Routine Fetal Ultrasound Scans), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05059093 completednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Developing and Testing Deep Learning Models for Fetal Biometry and Amniotic Volume Assessment in Routine Fetal Ultrasound Scans

TypeobservationalSponsorDeepechoRan2021 to 2022Enrolled122ConditionsSmall for Gestational Age Infant, Fetal Growth Restriction, Oligohydramnios, PolyhydramniosArmsClassification and segmentation deep learning models
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Doppler Assessment of the Fetal Brain Circulation.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  2. The association of placental to fetal ratio with pregnancy duration.Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. STAN and fetal deaths.Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jostein GryttenDepartment of Community Dentistry, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-7946-6385
Irene SkauDepartment of Community Dentistry, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Rune SørensenBI Norwegian Business School, Oslo, Norway.
Anne EskildDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-2756-1583
University of Oslo · NOAkershus University Hospital · NOBI Norwegian Business School · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo examine the effect that the introduction of new diagnostic technology in obstetric care has had on fetal death. DATA SOURCE: The Medical Birth Registry of Norway provided detailed medical information for approximately 1.2 million deliveries from 1967 to 1995. Information about diagnostic technology was collected directly from the maternity units, using a questionnaire. STUDY

designThe data were analyzed using a hospital fixed-effects regression with fetal mortality as the outcome measure. The key independent variables were the introduction of ultrasound and electronic fetal monitoring at each maternity ward. Hospital-specific trends and risk factors of the mother were included as control variables. The richness of the data allowed us to perform several robustness tests. PRINCIPAL FINDING: The introduction of ultrasound caused a significant drop in fetal mortality rate, while the introduction of electronic fetal monitoring had no effect on the rate. In the population as a whole, ultrasound contributed to a reduction in fetal deaths of nearly 20 percent. For post-term deliveries, the reduction was well over 50 percent.

conclusionThe introduction of ultrasound made a major contribution to the decline in fetal mortality at the end of the last century.

Indexed as

CardiotocographyDelivery, ObstetricFemaleFetal MortalityHumansInfant, NewbornInventionsNorwayPregnancyRegistriesSurveys and QuestionnairesUltrasonographyeconometricsmaternal and perinatal care and outcomesObstetrics/Gynecologytechnology adoption/diffusion/use

Identifiers

PMID29349772
PMCPMC6232411
OpenAlexW2789341463

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.