Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29349613›Full record

ReviewJournal of neuro-oncology2018

Tumor treating fields: a new approach to glioblastoma therapy.

Jonathan Rick, Ankush Chandra, Manish K Aghi

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. RNA methylation in mammalian development and cancer.Cell biology and toxicology · 2021
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jonathan RickDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of California at San Francisco (UCSF), 505 Parnassus Avenue Room M779, San Francisco, CA, 94143-0112, USA. Jonathan.Rick@ucsf.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9132-8313
Ankush ChandraDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of California at San Francisco (UCSF), 505 Parnassus Avenue Room M779, San Francisco, CA, 94143-0112, USA.
Manish K AghiDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of California at San Francisco (UCSF), 505 Parnassus Avenue Room M779, San Francisco, CA, 94143-0112, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Glioblastoma is an aggressive brain malignancy with poor outcomes. Current standard of care involves surgery, radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Even with optimal treatment, 5-year survival rates are low. Many patients are unable to tolerate the considerable side effects that therapy involves and suffer from low quality of life. Anti-mitotic tumor treating fields have shown potential in treating glioblastoma with data suggesting that they prolong disease-free survival and overall survival. Novocure has marketed a device that generates these fields via externally placed electrodes. Incorporation of electric field therapy into GBM treatment has been somewhat slow, due to concerns about cost, practicality of its usage from a patient perspective, and hesitation of the medical and scientific community to embrace its unconventional mechanism. However, clinical trials have demonstrated this therapy has relatively minor side effects and high patient compliance. In this review, we explore the current state of this technology and discuss the benefits and limitations of tumor treating fields.

Indexed as

Electric Stimulation TherapyAnimalsBrain NeoplasmsClinical Trials as TopicGlioblastomaHumansCancerGlioblastomaMinimally invasiveTumor treating fields

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.