Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29349546›Full record

ArticlePrevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research2018

Understanding Who Benefits from Parenting Interventions for Children's Conduct Problems: an Integrative Data Analysis.

Patty Leijten, Maartje Raaijmakers, Leoniek Wijngaards, Walter Matthys, Ankie Menting, Maud Hemink-van Putten, Bram Orobio de Castro

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Technology-Assisted Parenting Interventions for Families Experiencing Social Disadvantage: a Meta-Analysis.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2020
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Understanding Who Benefits Most from Family-Based Prevention: Differential Intervention Effects for Families with Low Income.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Discussant: Distilling symptom heterogeneity in youth with ODD: a commentary on Leadbeater et al., 2023.Journal of the Canadian Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry = Journal de l'Academie canadienne de psychiatrie de l'enfant et de l'adolescent · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Exploring Parenting Profiles to Understand Who Benefits from the Incredible Years Parenting Program.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Annual Research Review: Cross-cultural similarities and differences in parenting.Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Patty LeijtenUniversity of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands. p.leijten@uva.nl.ORCID 0000-0002-8828-4049
Maartje RaaijmakersUtrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Leoniek WijngaardsUtrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Walter MatthysUtrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Ankie MentingUtrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Maud Hemink-van PuttenUtrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Bram Orobio de CastroUtrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands.

Funding

ZonMw 729101004
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Parenting interventions are an effective strategy to reduce children's conduct problems. For some families, that is, not all families benefit equally. Individual trials tend to be underpowered and often lack variability to differentiate between families how benefit less or more. Integrating individual family level data across trials, we aimed to provide more conclusive results about often presumed key family (parental education and ethnic background) and child characteristics (problem severity, ADHD symptoms and emotional problems) as putative moderators of parenting intervention effects. We included data from 786 families (452 intervention; 334 control) from all four trials on the Incredible Years parenting intervention in The Netherlands (three randomized; one matched control). Children ranged between 2 and 10 years (M = 5.79; SD = 1.66). Of the families, 31% had a lower educational level and 29% had an ethnic minority background. Using multilevel regression, we tested whether each of the putative moderators affected intervention effects. Incredible Years reduced children's conduct problems (d = - .34). There were no differential effects by families' educational or ethnic background, or by children's level of ADHD symptoms. Children with more severe conduct problems and those with more emotional problems benefited more. Post hoc sensitivity analyses showed that for the two trials with longer-term data, moderation effects disappeared at 4 or 12 months follow-up. Often assumed moderators have some, but limited abilities to explain who benefits from parenting interventions. This suggests the need for studying theoretically more precise moderators in prevention research, other than relatively static family characteristics alone.

Indexed as

ParentingChildChild Behavior DisordersChild, PreschoolData AnalysisData Interpretation, StatisticalHumansNetherlandsParentsProgram EvaluationRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicConduct problemsDiversityIntegrative data analysisParenting intervention

Identifiers

PMID29349546
PMCPMC5899103

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.