Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29349538›Full record

ArticleGenetica2018

Capturing pair-wise epistatic effects associated with three agronomic traits in barley.

Yi Xu, Yajun Wu, Jixiang Wu

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Genetica, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 99% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yi XuDepartment of Agronomy, Horticulture, and Plant Science, South Dakota State University, Box 2140C, Brookings, SD, 57007, USA.
Yajun WuDepartment of Biology and Microbiology, South Dakota State University, Brookings, SD, 57007, USA.
Jixiang WuDepartment of Agronomy, Horticulture, and Plant Science, South Dakota State University, Box 2140C, Brookings, SD, 57007, USA. jixiang.wu@sdstate.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4484-4796
South Dakota State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genetic association mapping has been widely applied to determine genetic markers favorably associated with a trait of interest and provide information for marker-assisted selection. Many association mapping studies commonly focus on main effects due to intolerable computing intensity. This study aims to select several sets of DNA markers with potential epistasis to maximize genetic variations of some key agronomic traits in barley. By doing so, we integrated a MDR (multifactor dimensionality reduction) method with a forward variable selection approach. This integrated approach was used to determine single nucleotide polymorphism pairs with epistasis effects associated with three agronomic traits: heading date, plant height, and grain yield in barley from the barley Coordinated Agricultural Project. Our results showed that four, seven, and five SNP pairs accounted for 51.06, 45.66 and 40.42% for heading date, plant height, and grain yield, respectively with epistasis being considered, while corresponding contributions to these three traits were 45.32, 31.39, 31.31%, respectively without epistasis being included. The results suggested that epistasis model was more effective than non-epistasis model in this study and can be more preferred for other applications.

Indexed as

Epistasis, GeneticPolymorphism, Single NucleotideAgricultureGenetic Association StudiesGenetic MarkersHordeumMolecular Sequence AnnotationQuantitative Trait LociGenetic MarkersAssociation mappingBarleyEpistasisForward selectionMultifactor dimensionality reductionSingle nucleotide polymorphism

Identifiers

PMID29349538
OpenAlexW2789295266

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.