Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29349509›Full record

ArticleJournal of anesthesia2018

Complex issues in new ultrasound-guided nerve blocks: how to name, where to inject, and how to publish.

Masanori Yamauchi, Yutaka Sato

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of anesthesia, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Masanori YamauchiDepartment of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Tohoku University School of Medicine, Seiryo-cho 1-1, Aoba-ku, Sendai, Miyagi, 980-8575, Japan. yamauchi@med.tohoku.ac.jp.ORCID 0000-0001-8708-6852
Yutaka SatoDepartment of Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, Junjindo Yuza Hospital, Yuza, Yamagata, Japan.
Tohoku University · JPYamagata University Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The recent development of ultrasound-guide nerve block has led to innovation in anesthesia and pain clinics. However, it has also led to some complex issues, including (1) how to name a new technique, (2) the appropriateness of an intramuscular approach, and (3) how to publicize a new technique. This review addresses naming strategy, feasibility of intramuscular approach block, and methods of publication. First, researchers and authors should pay attention to appropriate nomenclature for the term 'approach', 'compartment block', and 'nerve block' for a new block. Second, it is lack of evidences to facilitate muscle injection, and adequate preparation and adherence to proper technique for intramuscular approach block should be considered; confirmation of abnormal signs at the injection area, use of a thin needle and the lowest concentration and volume of local anesthetic without supplementation with steroid or epinephrine, compressing hemostasis, and sufficient interval of the blocks. Third, adequate dissemination of information would also be necessary through publication in appropriate media. We hope this review boost reasonable development of nerve block.

Indexed as

Ultrasonography, InterventionalAnesthetics, LocalHumansInformation DisseminationInjectionsInjections, IntramuscularInternetNeedlesNerve BlockPublishingAnesthetics, LocalCompartment blockInternetMuscle compartment blockNerve block

Identifiers

PMID29349509
OpenAlexW2785043933

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.