Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29349300›Full record

ArticleScience advances2018

Tensile forces drive a reversible fibroblast-to-myofibroblast transition during tissue growth in engineered clefts.

Philip Kollmannsberger, Cécile M Bidan, John W C Dunlop, Peter Fratzl, Viola Vogel

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Science advances, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 91 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
91citing papers in PubMed
13.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

91 citing papers in PubMed, 142 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. An NFATC4 phospho-switch links matrix stiffness to fibroblast fate.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Fiber recruitment drives a phase transition of cell polarization at a critical cell spacing in matrix-mediated tissue remodeling.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

31 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Philip KollmannsbergerLaboratory of Applied Mechanobiology, Institute of Translational Medicine, Department of Health Science and Technology, ETH (Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule) Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-8049-6186
Cécile M BidanDepartment of Biomaterials, Max Planck Institute of Colloids and Interfaces, Golm, Germany.
John W C DunlopDepartment of Biomaterials, Max Planck Institute of Colloids and Interfaces, Golm, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2741-6383
Peter FratzlDepartment of Biomaterials, Max Planck Institute of Colloids and Interfaces, Golm, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4437-7830
Viola VogelLaboratory of Applied Mechanobiology, Institute of Translational Medicine, Department of Health Science and Technology, ETH (Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule) Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-2898-7671
Board of the Swiss Federal Institutes of Technology · CHMax Planck Institute of Colloids and Interfaces · DECentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FR

Funding

European Research Council 233157
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Myofibroblasts orchestrate wound healing processes, and if they remain activated, they drive disease progression such as fibrosis and cancer. Besides growth factor signaling, the local extracellular matrix (ECM) and its mechanical properties are central regulators of these processes. It remains unknown whether transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) and tensile forces work synergistically in up-regulating the transition of fibroblasts into myofibroblasts and whether myofibroblasts undergo apoptosis or become deactivated by other means once tissue homeostasis is reached. We used three-dimensional microtissues grown in vitro from fibroblasts in macroscopically engineered clefts for several weeks and found that fibroblasts transitioned into myofibroblasts at the highly tensed growth front as the microtissue progressively closed the cleft, in analogy to closing a wound site. Proliferation was up-regulated at the growth front, and new highly stretched fibronectin fibers were deposited, as revealed by fibronectin fluorescence resonance energy transfer probes. As the tissue was growing, the ECM underneath matured into a collagen-rich tissue containing mostly fibroblasts instead of myofibroblasts, and the fibronectin fibers were under reduced tension. This correlated with a progressive rounding of cells from the growth front inward, with decreased α-smooth muscle actin expression, YAP nuclear translocation, and cell proliferation. Together, this suggests that the myofibroblast phenotype is stabilized at the growth front by tensile forces, even in the absence of endogenously supplemented TGF-β, and reverts into a quiescent fibroblast phenotype already 10 μm behind the growth front, thus giving rise to a myofibroblast-to-fibroblast transition. This is the hallmark of reaching prohealing homeostasis.

Indexed as

Cell DifferentiationTensile StrengthActinsCell NucleusCell ProliferationCells, CulturedCytoskeletonDermisExtracellular MatrixFibronectinsHeterocyclic Compounds, 4 or More RingsHumansMyofibroblastsTissue EngineeringTransforming Growth Factor betaACTA2 protein, humanActinsblebbistatinFibronectinsHeterocyclic Compounds, 4 or More RingsTransforming Growth Factor beta

Identifiers

PMID29349300
PMCPMC5771696
OpenAlexW2784479902

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.