Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29349266›Full record

ArticleSSM - population health2017

Can we determine whether physical limitations are more prevalent in the US than in countries with comparable life expectancy?

Dana A Glei, Noreen Goldman, Carol D Ryff, Maxine Weinstein

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in SSM - population health, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Change in Mobility: Consistency of Estimates and Predictors Across Studies of Older Adults.The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Dana A GleiCenter for Population and Health, Georgetown University, Mailing address: 5985 San Aleso Court, Santa Rosa, CA 95409-3912, USA.
Noreen GoldmanOffice of Population Research and Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs, Princeton University, 243 Wallace Hall, Princeton, NJ 08544-2091, USA.
Carol D RyffDepartment of Psychology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1300 University Avenue, 2245 MSC, Madison, WI 53706, USA.
Maxine WeinsteinCenter for Population and Health, Georgetown University, 312 Healy Hall, 37th & O Streets, NW, Washington, DC 20057-1197, USA.

Funding

U19 MIDlife in the United States-Diversity Supplement-WellsU19AG051426 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI CHRISTOPHER L COE · 2016 to 2026
$74.8M
STATISTICS COREP01AG020166 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI RYFF, CAROL D. · 2002 to 2015
$50.6M
ZDV &3TC NEVIRAPINE COMBINATION THERAPY IN HIV 1 INFECTED INFANTS &M01RR000865 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI WASHINGTON, ARNOLD E. · 1985 to 2011
$43.4M
Institutional Clinical and Translational Science AwardUL1TR000427 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI DREZNER, MARC KENNETH · 2012 to 2016
$32.2M
BIODEMOGRAPHY OF HEALTH, SOCIAL FACTORS &LIFE CHALLENGER01AG016661 · NIA · RAND CORPORATION · PI WEINSTEIN, MAXINE A · 1999 to 2013
$9.5M
WIHS INTENSIVE PHARMACOKINETIC STUDY (IPS)M01RR023942 · NCRR · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI FEDEROFF, HOWARD J. · 2007 to 2009
$6.9M
BIODEMOGRAPHY OF HEALTH, SOCIAL FACTORS AND LIFE CHANGER01AG016790 · NIA · PRINCETON UNIVERSITY · PI GOLDMAN, NOREEN · 1999 to 2014
$5.6M
Scientific and Technical Computing CoreP2CHD047879 · NICHD · PRINCETON UNIVERSITY · PI SALGANIK, MATTHEW J. · 2014 to 2018
$2.0M
Biodemography of Health, Social Factors and Life ChallengeR56AG016661 · NIA · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI GOLDMAN, NOREEN, WEINSTEIN, MAXINE A · 2015 to 2015
$298k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000427NCRR NIH HHS M01 RR000865NCRR NIH HHS M01 RR023942NIA NIH HHS P01 AG020166NIA NIH HHS R01 AG016661NIA NIH HHS R01 AG016790NIA NIH HHS R56 AG016661NIA NIH HHS U19 AG051426NICHD NIH HHS P2C HD047879
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We evaluate the variability in estimates of self-reported physical limitations by age across four nationally representative surveys in the US. We consider its implications for determining whether, as previous literature suggests, the US estimates reveal limitations at an earlier age than in three countries with similar life expectancy: England, Taiwan, and Costa Rica. Based on cross-sectional data from seven population-based surveys, we use local mean smoothing to plot self-reported limitations by age for each of four physical tasks for each survey, stratified by sex. We find substantial variation in the estimates in the US across four nationally-representative surveys. For example, one US survey suggests that American women experience a walking limitation 15 years earlier than their Costa Rican counterparts, while another US survey implies that Americans have a 4-year advantage. Differences in mode of survey may account for higher prevalence of limitations in the one survey that used a self-administered mail-in questionnaire than in the other surveys that used in-person or telephone interviews. Yet, even among US surveys that used the same mode, there is still so much variability in estimates that we cannot conclude whether Americans have better or worse function than their counterparts in the other countries. Seemingly minor differences in question wording and response categories may account for the remaining inconsistency. If minor differences in question wording can result in such extensive variation in the estimates within a given population, then lack of comparability is likely to be an even greater problem when examining results across countries that do not share the same language or culture. Despite the potential utility of self-reported physical function within a survey sample, our findings imply that absolute estimates of population-level prevalence of self-reported physical limitations are unlikely to be strictly comparable across countries-or even across surveys within the same population.

Indexed as

ComparativeCRELES, Costa Rican Study on Longevity and Healthy AgingELSA, English Longitudinal Study of AgingHRS, Health and Retirement SurveyMIDUS, Midlife in the United States studyNHANES, National Health and Nutritional Examination SurveyNHIS, National Health Interview SurveyPhysical functionPhysical limitationsSelf-reportSurvey dataTLSA, Taiwan Longitudinal Study of AgingUnited States

Identifiers

PMID29349266
PMCPMC5769036

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.