Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29349190›Full record

ArticleSSM - population health2016

Barriers to uptake of antenatal maternal screening tests in Senegal.

Winny Koster, Pascale Ondoa, Aïcha Marceline Sarr, Ahmad Iyane Sow, Constance Schultsz, Jean Sakande, Souleymane Diallo, Robert Pool

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in SSM - population health, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Winny KosterAmsterdam Institute for Global Health and Development, Pietersbergweg 17, 1105BM Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Pascale OndoaAmsterdam Institute for Global Health and Development, Pietersbergweg 17, 1105BM Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Aïcha Marceline SarrDirection des Laboratoires, Ministère de la Santé et de l'Action Sociale, Sacré-Cœur Pyrotechnie no. 88 B, Dakar, Senegal.
Ahmad Iyane SowDirection des Laboratoires, Ministère de la Santé et de l'Action Sociale, Sacré-Cœur Pyrotechnie no. 88 B, Dakar, Senegal.
Constance SchultszAmsterdam Institute for Global Health and Development, Pietersbergweg 17, 1105BM Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Jean SakandeUniversity of Ouagadougou, Health Department, Laboratory of Biochemistry, 09 BP 863 Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso.
Souleymane DialloCentre d'Infectiologie Charles Mérieux Mali (CICM), Rue du Dr Charles Mérieux, Ex Base Aérienne, BP 2283 Bamako, Mali.
Robert PoolCentre for Social Science and Global Health, University of Amsterdam, Nieuwe Achtergracht 166, 1018WV Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Amsterdam Institute for Global Health and Development · NLMinistère de la Santé Publique et Action Sociale · SNUniversity of Amsterdam · NLUniversité Joseph Ki-Zerbo · BF

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEvidence exists that selective antenatal maternal screening tests contribute to the reduction of maternal morbidity and mortality. However, data are lacking on coverage with the complete set of recommended tests. The study aimed to identify barriers to uptake of the complete set of tests recommended by the Ministry of Health in Senegal.

methodsData were collected in communities, antenatal care (ANC) clinics and the laboratories of 11 public health care facilities across Senegal. Mixed-methods included ethnography (observations and informal conversations), in-depth interviews and workshops at the health facilities; structured interviews with 283 women receiving antenatal tests ("women in the lab"); in-depth interviews with 81 women in communities who were pregnant or had recently delivered ("community women").

resultsOnly 13% of community women and 22% of women in the lab had received the complete set of tests. For various social, financial and antenatal care-related reasons 38% of community women who visited antenatal care facilities did not access a laboratory. The lowest test uptake was in women receiving antenatal care at health posts. Barriers at the laboratory level were the cost of the test, stock-outs of reagents, and broken equipment. Midwives were the main gatekeepers of the laboratory, not requesting (all) tests because of assumptions about women's financial problems and reliance on clinical symptoms.

conclusionIn Senegal, recommended antenatal maternal screening tests are substantially underutilized. Efforts to increase test uptake should include accessible testing guidelines, reducing the cost of tests, raising awareness about the reasons for tests, and making the complete test set in point-of-care format accessible in peripheral health posts. National and international antenatal care policies and programs should facilitate access to maternal screening tests as a contribution to reducing maternal and infant morbidity and mortality.

Indexed as

Access to careAntenatal careLaboratoryMaternal screening testsMixed methodsMulti-level studySenegal

Identifiers

PMID29349190
PMCPMC5757953
OpenAlexW2531704693

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.