Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29349066›Full record

ReviewBioMed research international2017

Cadmium Exposure as a Putative Risk Factor for the Development of Pancreatic Cancer: Three Different Lines of Evidence.

Aleksandra Buha, David Wallace, Vesna Matovic, Amie Schweitzer, Branislav Oluic, Dusan Micic, Vladimir Djordjevic

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BioMed research international, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 96 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Ecotoxicological Effects of Heavy Metals on Rice (Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Aleksandra BuhaDepartment of Toxicology "Akademik Danilo Soldatović", University of Belgrade, Faculty of Pharmacy, Belgrade, Serbia.ORCID 0000-0002-6942-7040
David WallaceSchool of Biomedical Science, Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences, Tulsa, OK, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8596-7338
Vesna MatovicDepartment of Toxicology "Akademik Danilo Soldatović", University of Belgrade, Faculty of Pharmacy, Belgrade, Serbia.
Amie SchweitzerSchool of Biomedical Science, Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences, Tulsa, OK, USA.
Branislav OluicEmergency Center, Clinical Center of Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia.
Dusan MicicEmergency Center, Clinical Center of Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia.ORCID 0000-0002-1461-7920
Vladimir DjordjevicFirst Surgical Clinic, Clinical Center of Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia.
Centar za Promociju Nauke · RSOklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences · USUniversity of Belgrade · RS

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although profoundly studied, etiology of pancreatic cancer (PC) is still rather scant. Exposure to cadmium (Cd), a ubiquitous metal associated with well-established toxic and carcinogenic properties, has been hypothesized to one putative cause of PC. Hence, we analyzed recently published observational studies, meta-analyses, and experimental animal and in vitro studies with the aim of summarizing the evidence of Cd involvement in PC development and describing the possible mechanisms. Consolidation of epidemiological data on PC and exposure to Cd indicated a significant association with an elevated risk of PC among general population exposed to Cd. Cadmium exposure of laboratory animals was showed to cause PC supporting the findings suggested by human studies. The concordance with human and animal studies is buttressed by in vitro studies, although in vitro data interpretation is problematic. In most instances, only significant effects are reported, and the concentrations of Cd are excessive, which would skew interpretation. Previous reports suggest that oxidative stress, apoptotic changes, and DNA cross-linking and hypermethylation are involved in Cd-mediated carcinogenesis. Undoubtedly, a significant amount of work is still needed to achieve a better understanding of the Cd involvement in pancreatic cancer which could facilitate prevention, diagnosis, and therapy of this fatal disease.

Indexed as

AnimalsCadmiumDisease Models, AnimalDNA MethylationHumansMiceOxidative StressPancreatic NeoplasmsRatsRisk FactorsCadmium

Identifiers

PMID29349066
PMCPMC5733953
OpenAlexW2769018203

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.