Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29349042›Full record

ArticleBiomolecular detection and quantification2018

An optimized targeted Next-Generation Sequencing approach for sensitive detection of single nucleotide variants.

S Stasik, C Schuster, C Ortlepp, U Platzbecker, M Bornhäuser, J Schetelig, G Ehninger, G Folprecht, C Thiede

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomolecular detection and quantification, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

S StasikUniversitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus, Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik I, Dresden, Germany.
C SchusterAgenDix GmbH, Dresden, Germany.
C OrtleppAgenDix GmbH, Dresden, Germany.
U PlatzbeckerUniversitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus, Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik I, Dresden, Germany.
M BornhäuserUniversitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus, Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik I, Dresden, Germany.
J ScheteligUniversitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus, Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik I, Dresden, Germany.
G EhningerUniversitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus, Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik I, Dresden, Germany.
G FolprechtUniversitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus, Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik I, Dresden, Germany.
C ThiedeUniversitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus, Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik I, Dresden, Germany.
Klinik und Poliklinik für Psychotherapie und Psychosomatik · DENational Center for Tumor Diseases · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Monitoring of minimal residual disease (MRD) has become an important clinical aspect for early relapse detection during follow-up care after cancer treatment. Still, the sensitive detection of single base pair point mutations via Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) is hampered mainly due to high substitution error rates. We evaluated the use of NGS for the detection of low-level variants on an Ion Torrent PGM system. As a model case we used the c.1849G > T (p.Val617Phe) mutation of the

Indexed as

CancerDetectionLow-level single nucleotide variantsMinimal residual diseaseNext-Generation sequencingQuantification

Identifiers

PMID29349042
PMCPMC5766748
OpenAlexW2782689192

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.