ArticleAmerican journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2017
Sparse domain approaches in dynamic SPECT imaging with high-performance computing.
Article in American journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Dynamic SPECT Assessment of Hepatic Function in Patients With Liver Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of medical imaging and radiation oncology · 2026Pooled it
- Pre-clinical SPECT and SPECT-CT in Oncology.Recent results in cancer research. Fortschritte der Krebsforschung. Progres dans les recherches sur le cancer · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Iterative reconstruction algorithms often have relatively large computation time affecting their clinical deployment. This is especially true for 4D reconstruction in dynamic imaging (DI). In this work, we have shown how sparse domain approaches and parallelization for static 3D image reconstruction and 4D dynamic image reconstruction (directly from sinogram) in Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT), without any intermediate 3D reconstructions, can improve computational efficiency. DI in SPECT is one of the hardest inverse problems in medical image reconstruction area and slow reconstruction is a challenge for this promising protocol. Our work hopefully, paves a new direction toward making DI in SPECT clinically viable. Our 4D reconstruction also is a novel application of non-negative matrix factorization (NNMF) in an inverse problem.
Indexed as
Identifiers
29348983PMC5768923What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.