Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29348976›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of burns and trauma2017

The validity and reliability of using ultrasound elastography to measure cutaneous stiffness, a systematic review.

Helen M DeJong, Steven Abbott, Marilyn Zelesco, Brendan F Kennedy, Mel R Ziman, Fiona M Wood

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of burns and trauma, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Skin biomechanical and viscoelastic properties measured with MyotonPRO in different areas of human body.Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging (ISSI) · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Helen M DeJongPerth Scar and Pain ClinicMount Pleasant, Western Australia, 6153, Australia.
Steven AbbottDepartment of Medical Imaging, Fiona Stanley HospitalMurdoch, Western Australian, 6150, Australia.
Marilyn ZelescoDepartment of Medical Imaging, Fiona Stanley HospitalMurdoch, Western Australian, 6150, Australia.
Brendan F KennedyBRITElab, Harry Perkins Institute of Medical Research, QEII Medical Centre Nedlands and Centre for Medical Research, The University of Western AustraliaCrawley, Western Australia, 6009, Australia.
Mel R ZimanSchool of Medical and Health Science, Edith Cowan UniversityJoondalup, Western Australia, 6027, Australia.
Fiona M WoodBurn Injury Research Unit, The University of Western Australia CrawleyWestern Australia, 6009, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUltrasound elastography is an imaging technology which can objectively and non-invasively assess tissue stiffness. It is emerging as a useful marker for disease diagnosis, progression and treatment efficacy.

objectiveTo examine current, published research evaluating the use of ultrasound elastography for the measurement of cutaneous or subcutaneous stiffness and to determine the level of validity and reliability, recommended methodologies and limitations.

methodsMEDLINE, Web of science and Scopus were systematically searched in August 2016 to identify original articles evaluating the use of ultrasound elastography to assess cutaneous stiffness. Relevant studies were then quality evaluated using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies v 2 (QUADAS-2) tool and the Quality Appraisal of Reliability Studies (QAREL).

resultsFrom a total of 688 articles, 14 met the inclusion criteria for full review. Within the 14 studies, elastography was used to evaluate tumors, systemic sclerosis, lymphedema, abscess, and post-radiation neck fibrosis. Only three robust studies demonstrated good interrater reliability, whereas all validity studies had low sample sizes and demonstrated risks of bias.

conclusionRobust evidence supporting the use of ultrasound elastography as a diagnostic tool in cutaneous conditions is low, however, initial indicators support further research to establish the utility of ultrasound elastography in dermatology.

Indexed as

cutaneousdermatologyelasticity imaging techniquesElastographyobjective skin assessmentshear-wavesonoelastographystrain imaging

Identifiers

PMID29348976
PMCPMC5768929

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.