Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29348908›Full record

ArticleJournal of healthcare engineering2017

Correlation Clustering of Stable Angina Clinical Care Patterns for 506 Thousand Patients.

Zsolt Vassy, István Kósa, István Vassányi

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of healthcare engineering, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Zsolt VassyMedical Informatics Research and Development Centre, University of Pannonia, Veszprém, Egyetem u. 10 8200, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0003-1370-0877
István KósaMedical Informatics Research and Development Centre, University of Pannonia, Veszprém, Egyetem u. 10 8200, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0002-8805-4307
István VassányiMedical Informatics Research and Development Centre, University of Pannonia, Veszprém, Egyetem u. 10 8200, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0002-9833-8864

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Our goal was to apply statistical and network science techniques to depict how the clinical pathways of patients can be used to characterize the practices of care providers. Methods: We included the data of 506,087 patients who underwent procedures related to ischemic heart disease. Patients were assigned to one of the 136 primary health-care centers using a voting scheme based on their residence. The clinical pathways were classified, and the spectrum of the pathway types was computed for each center, then a network was built with the centers as nodes and spectrum correlations as edge weights. Then Louvain clustering was used to group centers with similar pathway spectra. Results: We identified 3 clusters with rather distinct characteristics that occupy quite compact spatial areas, though no geographical information was used in clustering. Network analysis and hierarchical clustering show the dominance of medical university clinics in each cluster. Conclusion: Though clinical guidelines provide a uniform regulation for medical decisions, doctors have great freedom in daily clinical practice. This freedom leads to regional preferences of certain clinical pathways, the intercenter professional links, and geographical locality and coupled with quantifiable consequences in terms of care costs and periprocedural risk of patients.

Indexed as

Cluster AnalysisCritical PathwaysAlgorithmsAngina, StableCommunicationData CollectionElectrocardiographyGeographyHumansHungaryMortalityMyocardial IschemiaMyocardial RevascularizationPattern Recognition, AutomatedPrimary Health CareRisk

Identifiers

PMID29348908
PMCPMC5734000

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.