Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29348737›Full record

ReviewContrast media & molecular imaging2017

Anna Vuorimaa, Eero Rissanen, Laura Airas

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Contrast media & molecular imaging, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Radiosynthesis and In Vitro Evaluation of [Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Quantitation of the APharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Novel targeted therapies for Parkinson's disease.Molecular medicine (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2021
    Review
  11. Development ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Article
  12. Synthesis and Biological Evaluation of a NovelInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Article
  13. P2XFrontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2021
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Anna VuorimaaTurku PET Centre, Turku University Hospital and University of Turku, Turku, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-0711-6917
Eero RissanenTurku PET Centre, Turku University Hospital and University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
Laura AirasTurku PET Centre, Turku University Hospital and University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
University of Turku · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adenosine receptors are G-protein coupled P1 purinergic receptors that are broadly expressed in the peripheral immune system, vasculature, and the central nervous system (CNS). Within the immune system, adenosine 2A (A

Indexed as

Corpus StriatumParkinson DiseaseAnimalsDrug Delivery SystemsHumansInflammationPositron-Emission TomographyRadiopharmaceuticalsReceptor, Adenosine A2AADORA2A protein, humanRadiopharmaceuticalsReceptor, Adenosine A2A

Identifiers

PMID29348737
PMCPMC5733838
OpenAlexW2770302210

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.