ArticleScientific reports2018
Universal type/subtype-specific antibodies for quantitative analyses of neuraminidase in trivalent influenza vaccines.
Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- ELISA-based quantification of neuraminidase in commercial influenza vaccines using virus-derived reference antigens.Microbiology spectrum · 2026Article
- Electrochemical and optical biosensors as transformative tools for multiplex detection of influenza viruses.Archives of microbiology · 2026Review
- Review
- The Quantification of Spike Proteins in the Inactivated SARS-CoV-2 Vaccines of the Prototype, Delta, and Omicron Variants by LC-MS.Vaccines · 2023Article
- Broadly Inhibiting Antineuraminidase Monoclonal Antibodies Induced by Trivalent Influenza Vaccine and H7N9 Infection in Humans.Journal of virology · 2020Article
- A neuraminidase potency assay for quantitative assessment of neuraminidase in influenza vaccines.NPJ vaccines · 2019Article
- Design of peptide epitope from the neuraminidase protein of influenza A and influenza B towards short peptide vaccine development.Bioinformation · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Both influenza viral hemagglutinin and neuraminidase can induce protective immune responses in humans. Although the viral hemagglutinin antigens have been quantified in influenza vaccines, the amounts of neuraminidase remain undetermined. Using comprehensive bioinformatics analyses of all neuraminidase sequences, we identified highly conserved and subtype-specific peptide epitopes within each of N1, N2 and type B neuraminidase groups. Mono-specific antibodies generated against these peptides bound to their respective subtype/type only while demonstrating remarkable specificity against the viral neuraminidase sequences without any cross-reactivity with allantoic and cellular proteins. Moreover, the subtype/type-specific antibodies were found not to interfere with one another when a mixture of vaccine samples was analysed. Importantly, immunoassay based on these antibodies can quantitatively determine neuraminidase in commercial trivalent vaccine samples. Analyses of vaccines from eight manufacturers using the same vaccine seeds revealed significant differences in neuraminidase levels. Specifically, while the ratio between neuraminidase and hemagglutinin in some products are found to be close 1/5, other products have a ratio of approximately 1/100, a level which is far below the theoretical ratio between neuraminidase and hemagglutinin in a virus. The antibody-based assays reported here could be of great value for better quality control of both monovalent and trivalent vaccines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.