Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29348500›Full record

ReviewNature immunology2018

Myeloid-derived suppressor cells coming of age.

Filippo Veglia, Michela Perego, Dmitry Gabrilovich

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature immunology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1,133 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1,133citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
80.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1,133 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 1,770 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Molecular Mechanisms and Immune Regulation in Prostate Cancer: A Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Targeting mAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  20. Review

1,073 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Filippo VegliaThe Wistar Institute, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Michela PeregoThe Wistar Institute, Philadelphia, PA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5671-928X
Dmitry GabrilovichThe Wistar Institute, Philadelphia, PA, USA. dgabrilovich@wistar.org.
The Wistar Institute · US

Funding

Correction of myeloid cell defects in cancerR01CA084488 · NCI · WISTAR INSTITUTE · PI GABRILOVICH, DMITRY I · 1999 to 2017
$5.4M
Mechanism of myeloid cell defect in cancerR01CA100062 · NCI · WISTAR INSTITUTE · PI GABRILOVICH, DMITRY I · 2004 to 2018
$4.0M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA084488NCI NIH HHS R01 CA100062
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) are a heterogeneous population of cells generated during a large array of pathologic conditions ranging from cancer to obesity. These cells represent a pathologic state of activation of monocytes and relatively immature neutrophils. MDSCs are characterized by a distinct set of genomic and biochemical features, and can, on the basis of recent findings, be distinguished by specific surface molecules. The salient feature of these cells is their ability to inhibit T cell function and thus contribute to the pathogenesis of various diseases. In this Review, we discuss the origin and nature of these cells; their distinctive features; and their biological roles in cancer, infectious diseases, autoimmunity, obesity and pregnancy.

Indexed as

AnimalsHumansMyeloid-Derived Suppressor Cells

Identifiers

PMID29348500
PMCPMC5854158
OpenAlexW2782485041

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.