Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29348208›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2018

Learning to make external sensory stimulus predictions using internal correlations in populations of neurons.

Audrey J Sederberg, Jason N MacLean, Stephanie E Palmer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Efficient coding, channel capacity, and the emergence of retinal mosaics.Advances in neural information processing systems · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Information Closure Theory of Consciousness.Frontiers in psychology · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Audrey J SederbergDepartment of Organismal Biology and Anatomy, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637.ORCID 0000-0003-4458-3773
Jason N MacLeanDepartment of Neurobiology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637.
Stephanie E PalmerDepartment of Organismal Biology and Anatomy, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637; sepalmer@uchicago.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-6211-6293

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To compensate for sensory processing delays, the visual system must make predictions to ensure timely and appropriate behaviors. Recent work has found predictive information about the stimulus in neural populations early in vision processing, starting in the retina. However, to utilize this information, cells downstream must be able to read out the predictive information from the spiking activity of retinal ganglion cells. Here we investigate whether a downstream cell could learn efficient encoding of predictive information in its inputs from the correlations in the inputs themselves, in the absence of other instructive signals. We simulate learning driven by spiking activity recorded in salamander retina. We model a downstream cell as a binary neuron receiving a small group of weighted inputs and quantify the predictive information between activity in the binary neuron and future input. Input weights change according to spike timing-dependent learning rules during a training period. We characterize the readouts learned under spike timing-dependent synaptic update rules, finding that although the fixed points of learning dynamics are not associated with absolute optimal readouts they convey nearly all of the information conveyed by the optimal readout. Moreover, we find that learned perceptrons transmit position and velocity information of a moving-bar stimulus nearly as efficiently as optimal perceptrons. We conclude that predictive information is, in principle, readable from the perspective of downstream neurons in the absence of other inputs. This suggests an important role for feedforward prediction in sensory encoding.

Indexed as

Models, NeurologicalAction PotentialsAnimalsCaudataComputer SimulationElectrodesLearningModels, StatisticalNerve NetNeural Networks, ComputerNeuronsRetinaRetinal Ganglion CellsVideo RecordingVision, Ocularinformation theorylearningplasticitypredictionretina

Identifiers

PMID29348208
PMCPMC5798322

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.