Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29348060›Full record

ArticleAddictive behaviors2018

Exposure to workplace smoking bans and continuity of daily smoking patterns on workdays and weekends.

Michael S Dunbar, Saul Shiffman, Siddharth Chandra

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Addictive behaviors, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. A Daily Assessment Study of Smoking Cessation After a Head and Neck Cancer Diagnosis.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Michael S DunbarUniversity of Pittsburgh, Department of Psychology, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. Electronic address: mdunbar@rand.org.
Saul ShiffmanUniversity of Pittsburgh, Department of Psychology, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Siddharth ChandraMichigan State University, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, East Lansing, MI, USA.

Funding

Understanding Emerging Patterns of Non-Daily Smoking: Field and Lab AssessmentsR01DA020742 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI SHIFFMAN, SAUL · 2006 to 2010
$2.8M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA020742
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIndividuals may compensate for workplace smoking bans by smoking more before or after work, or escaping bans to smoke, but no studies have conducted a detailed, quantitative analysis of such compensatory behaviors using real-time data.

methods124 daily smokers documented smoking occasions over 3weeks using ecological momentary assessment (EMA), and provided information on real-world exposure to smoking restrictions and type of workplace smoking policy (full, partial, or no bans). Mixed modeling and generalized estimating equations assessed effects of time of day, weekday (vs weekend), and workplace policy on mean cigarettes per hour (CPH) and reports of changing location to smoke.

resultsIndividuals were most likely to change locations to smoke during business hours, regardless of work policy, and frequency of EMA reports of restrictions at work was associated with increased likelihood of changing locations to smoke (OR=1.11, 95% CI 1.05-1.16; p<0.0001). Workplace smoking policy, time block, and weekday/weekend interacted to predict CPH (p<0.01), such that individuals with partial work bans -but not those with full bans - smoked more at night (9pm - bed) on weekdays compared to weekends.

conclusionsThere was little evidence that full bans interfered with subjects' smoking during business hours across weekdays and weekends. Smokers largely compensate for exposure to workplace smoking bans by escaping restrictions during business hours. Better understanding the effects of smoking bans on smoking behavior may help to improve their effectiveness and yield insights into determinants of smoking in more restrictive environments.

Indexed as

Cigarette SmokingSmoke-Free PolicyWorkplaceAdultCotinineEcological Momentary AssessmentFemaleHumansMaleMetabolic Clearance RateMiddle AgedOrganizational PolicyTime FactorsTobacco Use DisorderCotinineCompensationSmoking behaviorTobacco controlWorkplace smoking policy

Identifiers

PMID29348060
PMCPMC5807201

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.