Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29348013›Full record

ArticleJACC. Cardiovascular interventions2018

Dose-Dependent Cardioprotection of Moderate (32°C) Versus Mild (35°C) Therapeutic Hypothermia in Porcine Acute Myocardial Infarction.

Rajesh Dash, Yoshiaki Mitsutake, Wook Bum Pyun, Fady Dawoud, Jennifer Lyons, Atsushi Tachibana, Kazuyuki Yahagi, Yuka Matsuura, Frank D Kolodgie, Renu Virmani and 4 more

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in JACC. Cardiovascular interventions, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Autophagy Behavior under Local Hypothermia in Myocardiocytes Injury.Cardiovascular & hematological agents in medicinal chemistry · 2024
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Effects of Therapeutic Hypothermia on Normal and Ischemic Heart.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2021
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Rajesh DashDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California; Cardiovascular Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, California. Electronic address: rhombus@stanford.edu.
Yoshiaki MitsutakeDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California.
Wook Bum PyunDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California; School of Medicine, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, South Korea.
Fady DawoudZOLL Circulation, Inc., San Jose, California.
Jennifer LyonsDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California.
Atsushi TachibanaDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California.
Kazuyuki YahagiCVPath Institute, Inc., Gaithersburg, Maryland.
Yuka MatsuuraDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California.
Frank D KolodgieCVPath Institute, Inc., Gaithersburg, Maryland.
Renu VirmaniCVPath Institute, Inc., Gaithersburg, Maryland.
Michael V McConnellDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California; Cardiovascular Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, California; Department of Electrical Engineering; Stanford University, Stanford, California; Verily Life Sciences, Mountain View, California.
Uday IllindalaZOLL Circulation, Inc., San Jose, California.
Fumiaki IkenoDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California; Cardiovascular Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, California.
Alan YeungDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California; Cardiovascular Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, California.
Cardiovascular Institute of the South · USStanford University · USCVPath Institute · USUniversidad Braulio Carrillo · CREwha Womans University · KR

Funding

Cardiac Magnetic Resonance to Detect Apoptosis in Vivo using Magnetic Labeling.K08HL097022 · NHLBI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI DASH, RAJESH · 2009 to 2013
$608k
NHLBI NIH HHS K08 HL097022
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe study investigated whether a dose response exists between myocardial salvage and the depth of therapeutic hypothermia.

backgroundCardiac protection from mild hypothermia during acute myocardial infarction (AMI) has yielded equivocal clinical trial results. Rapid, deeper hypothermia may improve myocardial salvage.

methodsSwine (n = 24) undergoing AMI were assigned to 3 reperfusion groups: normothermia (38°C) and mild (35°C) and moderate (32°C) hypothermia. One-hour anterior myocardial ischemia was followed by rapid endovascular cooling to target reperfusion temperature. Cooling began 30 min before reperfusion. Target temperature was reached before reperfusion and was maintained for 60 min. Infarct size (IS) was assessed on day 6 using cardiac magnetic resonance, triphenyl tetrazolium chloride, and histopathology.

resultsTriphenyl tetrazolium chloride area at risk (AAR) was equivalent in all groups (p = 0.2), but 32°C exhibited 77% and 91% reductions in IS size per AAR compared with 35°C and 38°C, respectively (AAR: 38°C, 45 ± 12%; 35°C, 17 ± 10%; 32°C, 4 ± 4%; p < 0.001) and comparable reductions per LV mass (LV mass: 38°C, 14 ± 5%; 35°C, 5 ± 3%; 32°C 1 ± 1%; p < 0.001). Importantly, 32°C showed a lower IS AAR (p = 0.013) and increased immunohistochemical granulation tissue versus 35°C, indicating higher tissue salvage. Delayed-enhancement cardiac magnetic resonance IS LV also showed marked reduction at 32°C (38°C: 10 ± 4%, p < 0.001; 35°C: 8 ± 3%; 32°C: 3 ± 2%, p < 0.001). Cardiac output on day 6 was only preserved at 32°C (reduction in cardiac output: 38°C, -29 ± 19%, p = 0.041; 35°C: -17 ± 33%; 32°C: -1 ± 28%, p = 0.041). Using linear regression, the predicted IS reduction was 6.7% (AAR) and 2.1% (LV) per every 1°C reperfusion temperature decrease.

conclusionsModerate (32°C) therapeutic hypothermia demonstrated superior and near-complete cardioprotection compared with 35°C and control, warranting further investigation into clinical applications.

Indexed as

AnimalsDisease Models, AnimalEdema, CardiacFemaleHypothermia, InducedMagnetic Resonance Imaging, CineMyocardial InfarctionMyocardiumReperfusion InjurySus scrofaTime FactorsTissue SurvivalVentricular Function, Leftacute MIcardiac MRI dose responsehypothermiaischemia-reperfusion injury

Identifiers

PMID29348013
PMCPMC5777183
OpenAlexW2782846696

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.