Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29347954›Full record

ArticleParasites & vectors2018

A reverse vaccinology approach to the identification and characterization of Ctenocephalides felis candidate protective antigens for the control of cat flea infestations.

Marinela Contreras, Margarita Villar, Sara Artigas-Jerónimo, Lidiia Kornieieva, Sergіі Mуtrofanov, José de la Fuente

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Parasites & vectors, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Bottom-Up Proteomics Workflow for Studying Multi-organism Systems.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025
    Article
  2. Salivary glands of the cat flea,Current research in insect science · 2024
    Review
  3. Using Proteomic Approaches to Unravel the Response ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Computational tools for modern vaccine development.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2020
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Marinela ContrerasSaBio. Instituto de Investigación en Recursos Cinegéticos IREC-CSIC-UCLM-JCCM, Ronda de Toledo s/n, 13005, Ciudad Real, Spain.
Margarita VillarSaBio. Instituto de Investigación en Recursos Cinegéticos IREC-CSIC-UCLM-JCCM, Ronda de Toledo s/n, 13005, Ciudad Real, Spain.
Sara Artigas-JerónimoSaBio. Instituto de Investigación en Recursos Cinegéticos IREC-CSIC-UCLM-JCCM, Ronda de Toledo s/n, 13005, Ciudad Real, Spain.
Lidiia KornieievaAcro Veterinary Laboratories, 15a Privokzalna Street, Pilipovichi village, Kyiv region, Ukraine.
Sergіі MуtrofanovAcro Veterinary Laboratories, 15a Privokzalna Street, Pilipovichi village, Kyiv region, Ukraine.
José de la FuenteSaBio. Instituto de Investigación en Recursos Cinegéticos IREC-CSIC-UCLM-JCCM, Ronda de Toledo s/n, 13005, Ciudad Real, Spain. jose_delafuente@yahoo.com.
Instituto de Investigación en Recursos Cinegéticos · ESOklahoma State University · US

Funding

Fundación General CSIC 201440E098
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite the abundance of the domestic cat flea, Ctenocephalides felis (Bouché, 1835) and disease risks associated with them, flea control is difficult and requires the development of new control interventions such as vaccines. In this study, a reverse vaccinology approach was designed to achieve a rational selection of cat flea candidate protective antigens.

methodsBased on transcriptomics and proteomics data from unfed adult fleas it was possible to select more specific candidate protective antigens based on highly represented and functionally relevant proteins present in the predicted exoproteome. The protective capacity of the recombinant antigens was evaluated for the control of C. felis infestations in vaccinated cats.

resultsVaccination with recombinant antigens induced an antibody response in immunized cats. Furthermore, a correlation was obtained between the effect of vaccination (antibody levels) and vaccine efficacy on flea phenotype (egg hatchability). The results suggested that the main effect of vaccination with these antigens was on reducing cat flea egg hatchability and fertility, with an overall vaccine efficacy of 32-46%. Although vaccination with these antigens did not have an effect on flea infestations, vaccines affecting reproductive capacity could reduce cat flea populations, particularly under conditions of direct insect transmission between cats.

conclusionsThese results support the development of vaccines with protective antigens affecting flea reproduction and development after feeding on immunized animals for the control of cat flea infestations.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntigensCat DiseasesCatsCtenocephalidesDrug DiscoveryFertilityFlea InfestationsGene Expression ProfilingInsect ProteinsProteomeTreatment OutcomeVaccines, SubunitVaccines, SyntheticAntigensInsect ProteinsProteomeVaccines, SubunitVaccines, SyntheticFleaImmunologyProteomicsTranscriptomicsVaccineVaccinology

Identifiers

PMID29347954
PMCPMC5774092
OpenAlexW2794798544

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.